HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
Tips & shafts
By George Fels
Consulting Editor George Fels has been writing for Billiards Digest since 1980, and his "Tips & Shafts" column is usually our readers' first stop when they crack open the magazine. For better or worse, pool has been his only mistress for 40-plus years.


Archives
• October 2024
• September 2024
• August 2024
• July 2024
• June 2024
• May 2024
• April 2024
• March 2024
• February 2024
• January 2024
• December 2023
• November 2023
• October 2023
• September 2023
• August 2023
• July 2023
• June 2023
• May 2023
• April 2023
• March 2023
• February 2023
• January 2023
• December 2022
• November 2022
• October 2022
• September 2022
• August 2022
• July 2022
• June 2022
• May 2022
• April 2022
• March 2022
• February 2022
• January 2022
• December 2021
• November 2021
• October 2021
• September 2021
• August 2021
• July 2021
• June 2021
• May 2021
• April 2021
• March 2021
• February 2021
• January 2021
• December 2020
• November 2020
• October 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• June 2020
• April 2020
• March 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• December 2019
• November 2019
• October 2019
• September 2019
• August 2019
• July 2019
• June 2019
• May 2019
• April 2019
• March 2019
• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• July 2018
• July 2018
• June 2018
• May 2018
• April 2018
• March 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• November 2017
• October 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• May 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• December 2015
• November 2015
• October 2015
• September 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• May 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008


Best of Fels
 
March: Holy Anticlimax, Batman!
March 2010
WELL, YOU can't have everything. I still think the Derby City Classic is the most pool fun you can have on earth (I missed Galveston, but I can't drive to it as I can to the DCC, and that's a deal-breaker). But this year's edition produced two of the dreariest final matches, in both one-pocket and straight pool, that you'd ever want to avoid. Four fine players all light-years off their best at the same time is, glumly, part of the game too. Up in the Accu-Stats broadcast booth, the great Dan DiLiberto and his erstwhile partners - Jimmy Mataya for the one-hole, and BD's stellar Mark Wilson for the 14.1 - searched heroically for insights that might brighten the proceedings. Not to be irreverent, guys, but methinks it's not going to matter much what you did wind up saying.

One-pocket purists will find solace in noting that all five games in the final were won by the player who didn't break, but that's not supposed to be the highlight of the match. In most of those games, the balls went up-table and got bunched, and no two players on the planet can breathe interest into such a moribund game. Winner Scott Frost is normally one of the more intriguing players to watch; his game is almost identical to Shannon Daulton's, both lefties taking a highly aggressive approach, even in defense, having mastered the subtle art of sending one or more object balls close to their pocket and hiding the cue ball from those balls at the same time. But he never really got a chance to show what he can do, stifled in part by Texan runner-up Sylver Ochoa's patience, cautiousness and remarkable escapes, which were generally all that was memorable in this event.

Ochoa's prim appearance suggests that he stumbled into the poolroom by mistake while looking for the library (or seminary); he's less than 30 and wouldn't even look that old except for the rimless glasses, which alone make him rare among pool's elite. He has now finished second in two of the DCC's premier events, one-pocket and banks, over the past three years, and is clearly one to watch, but Frost's future looms even brighter. With Cliff Joyner far off his game for close to two years now, the broad consensus holds that the world's two best one-pocket players are Efren Reyes and Daulton; Frost, just in his early 30s himself, may well have a legitimate claim to being No. 3.

The 14.1 finals were equally tedious, and that's a shame because this is only the second year for actual competitive straight-pool play at the DCC; in the past, its inclusion has mostly been limited to a long-run contest, not unlike expecting Home Run Derby to fairly represent all baseball. That competition was in place this year, too, except that the top competitors again advanced to single-elimination play, all made possible, as usual, by the spectacular generosity of this magazine's Bob Jewett. The genial John Schmidt led the qualifiers with 150+ (no news there), with Johnny Archer just nine balls behind, and in the real-game quarterfinals, Schmidt topped his own act with 171. Having already won added prize money for attaining 150+ in competition, and just two racks from winning even more for 200, Schmidt made a shot selection for No. 172 that bordered on masochistic. This was a narrow-angle, side-pocket challenge, with far easier opportunities available, and he nicely complemented his mysterious choice with excessive speed; the pocket point spat the ball back as though in contempt. Schmidt's response was remarkably placid, I thought; with a dazed smile, he simply said, "What an idiot. Thanks for sweating it, everybody." The simultaneous owner of pro pool's best golf game and one of its best smiles, John Schmidt is pool's current answer to Sara Lee. Nobody doesn't like him.

The other memorable line of the tournament came from Schmidt's close friend and former cuemaker, Bobby Hunter. He has a wonderfully dry sense of humor, having once confided to me that he was thinking of getting married with the rationale, "I'm sure I've done crazier things." In losing to Germany's classy player/teacher/coach/author/DVD producer Ralf Eckert, Hunter made it clear from the outset that he was going to be competitive in class only, and generally channeled Stevie Wonder throughout. Asked afterward what happened, Hunter defended himself staunchly. "I ran a 3 and a 9 on the man," he asserted. "Couldn't believe it when he didn't fold."

Would that the final match had been anywhere near that enjoyable. Eckert was no great surprise as a finalist; Charlie Williams probably was, and did very little, in winning, to dispel that surprise. The combined track and swimming events of the last 10 Olympics have nothing on Williams when it comes to false starts. On close to 75% of his shots, Williams would get down, aim, take three practice strokes, and then stand up again to start the whole process over, second-guessing himself more than a lousy horseplayer at post time. At one point, he audaciously asked referee Jewett to announce his shots before he (Williams) got down to aim. How Jewett found the restraint not to ask, "And what might that be?" is anybody's guess. It's not unusual in 14.1 for one struggling competitor to drag the other down with him, but in this contest, the villain was indeterminable. The two men generally traded runs of less than one rack, although Williams did manage a shaky 39 when he needed it most. Yet his somnambulistic performance must be forgiven; along with Jewett, he has been one of straight pool's very strongest allies for years, and both men go well out-of-pocket to keep the magnificent game alive and kicking.

Perhaps it's worth observing that in both finals, the ultimate winner fell to the ground, tennis player-style, in supposed relief. Funny; that's what most of the gallery felt like doing too.

MORE VIDEO...