clash royale hack pixel gun 3d hack mobile legends
HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
Tips & shafts
By George Fels
Consulting Editor George Fels has been writing for Billiards Digest since 1980, and his "Tips & Shafts" column is usually our readers' first stop when they crack open the magazine. For better or worse, pool has been his only mistress for 40-plus years.


Archives
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• May 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• December 2015
• November 2015
• October 2015
• September 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• May 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• January 2008


Best of Fels
 
February: Fickleness
February 2008
It's a VERY nice game," said the immortal pool champion Willie Mosconi, speaking of three-cushion billiards, "but the balls just roll around all day as if they had no place to go."

Homeless or otherwise, the billiard balls of America are desperate for company these days. (Mosconi, by the way, had a long run of 13 and was excellent at the game despite that arch overview, as were his contemporaries Ralph Greenleaf and Irving Crane.) The lion's share of American commercial billiard rooms - many of which advertise "Billiards" rather than "Pool," which is a bit like curling your little finger as you chug a beer - do not even offer carom tables. International players win just about all our national championships, and if it were even possible to seed the top 10 American billiards players, they would still be so anonymous that their listing could practically be interchanged with the FBI's Ten Most Wanted list.

I grew up watching good billiards. The best player in my first room, the late Bill Romain, finished third nationally in 1970, and when the great Bensinger's was still located in downtown Chicago, there was an entire floor of 30-plus tables for billiards which drew experts only. Of course, all those players, including Romain, are gone now; the only competitor from that era who remains around is the wonderful Joe Diaz, approaching his mid-80s and still a semi-regular player at Chris's Billiards. Nobody young seems to want to play the game in this country; it's way too hard, and, as Mosconi suggested, you don't get the gratification of watching a ball disappear. And yet there are few billiard-room pleasures that can match the elegant satisfaction in watching two good caroms players match up.

When I began writing this column, I promised myself that I was not going to bore people by writing about my own pool game unless it was for comedic effect, which was about what my game was worth most of those years. Now and then I would break that promise on special occasions, such as sharing with you my last triple-digit run, my deep (some would say "psychotic") dedication to 14.1 practice, stuff like that. But at this point, I have a shocking confession to declare: I do not love pool to the extent that I enjoy playing it poorly. And yet, with my 223rd birthday approaching rapidly, I cannot expect to improve.

The quest of my pool practice used to be a 50-ball run. While I can still occasionally achieve that, I can't with the same regularity I used to, thanks to the aforementioned birthday accumulation, arthritis, and slowly ebbing focus. The goal is now to run two racks multiple times, and I can accomplish that about as frequently as I used to run 50. Rather than dumping me outright, my life's passion is letting me down gently. And billiards - which I still play as well as I ever did - is looking better and better.

To be specific, I probably average somewhere around .5, good enough that I don't embarrass anyone but not quite good enough for tournaments - in other words, just about where I was at pool. For just about as long as I've been hacking away at both games, I've had players, including experts, telling me that caroms should be my game of choice. I might have been a tournament-level player, but my own determination was that I would have had to quit pool in order to achieve that, and that simply was not a sacrifice I was prepared to make.

And I can't now, either. Still, more and more often, I find myself soloing on the no-pocket tables. Chris's has always had a superb field of caroms players; every level of play from split-time to expensive action is available on a near-daily basis. Gambling at either of the cue games ceased to be interesting to me some years ago, and sociable competition is far, far easier to attract on the caroms side of the room. But mostly, I like to play alone.

As long as I've been around, billiards players have always insisted that the skill involved in scoring a single point at three-cushion is the equivalent of that needed to run 13 balls at pool. I have no idea how that equation was first struck, but, along with the deathless "Bums play pool, gentlemen play billiards" that's been around since the Depression, and the latter game's magnificent claim, "The ultimate in man's control over a ball," it makes a pretty good case that the game belongs on some kind of pedestal.

Thus I suppose I've put it on one. Maybe I can't run 50 balls at the drop of a hat anymore (as though I ever could), but I can still run four billiards, or the stated equivalent of a 50-ball run. Having spent most of my cue-games life at the pool table, I'm extremely comfortable cutting the first object ball thin with inside English, and many of the shots on which I score could be described that way. I still miss many shots by a quark - I just love when your cue approaches, and leaves, closely enough that you can detect its reflection in the object ball - and I will never understand how you can send a cue ball and object ball in opposite directions, at different speeds, angles and spins, and still have them violently collide seconds later for a kiss-out. But I'm still good at the game, and that makes up for a multitude of sins.

Pop-up toys for infants have documented that when something drops out of sight, the infant gets great pleasure, and I've long suspected that's what is really going on psychologically at pool, no matter the age of the combatants. The satisfaction of scoring a billiard, while undeniable, is an entirely different specie of joy, a successful run an entirely different feeling of mastery.

It's really not unlike watching a soulmate slip away at the same time you're given a chance to court an even more beautiful woman. (I've accomplished the first half of that, too.) You get only one soulmate per existence, and no other thrill will ever be the same. On the other hand, it's not bad at all to be reminded that you're still alive.

MORE VIDEO...