clash royale hack
HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
Tips & shafts
By George Fels
Consulting Editor George Fels has been writing for Billiards Digest since 1980, and his "Tips & Shafts" column is usually our readers' first stop when they crack open the magazine. For better or worse, pool has been his only mistress for 40-plus years.

• September 2021
• August 2021
• July 2021
• June 2021
• May 2021
• April 2021
• March 2021
• February 2021
• January 2021
• December 2020
• November 2020
• October 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• June 2020
• April 2020
• March 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• December 2019
• November 2019
• October 2019
• September 2019
• August 2019
• July 2019
• June 2019
• May 2019
• April 2019
• March 2019
• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• July 2018
• July 2018
• June 2018
• May 2018
• April 2018
• March 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• November 2017
• October 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• May 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• December 2015
• November 2015
• October 2015
• September 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• May 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008

Best of Fels
(from February 1988)
WHAT ELSE WOULD you call them? Un-hustlers? We're speaking here of the absolute non-players who somehow still fashion a life for themselves around playing pool, a tiny outer-outer-outer circle in the few ripples that the pool universe makes. They are a feisty breed indeed, coasting on a repertoire of misses, miscues, curses, leaps from stance and other body language, and no real firepower to fall back on save the ability to run just a few balls. And they generally explain their craft in eight humble, simple classic words, rich in pathos, worthy of somebody's headstone someplace: "You oughta see the idiots I play with."

My favorite among the un-hustlers is Jim "Peaches" Rochford, a well-read and gentle patron of the arts and unusually gifted storyteller. Peaches is also a master cum laude of the grind-away score that turns a few bucks into hundreds over many hours, where seldom is seen a run much over three. "There is just no gambling involved any more when I hit the bars," Jim explains with likable equanimity, "I simply have to win." And so he does; but the road has been long, with many a winding turn.

One of Peaches' semi-steady customers (I use the term "steady" advisedly) at Bensinger's was one Tommy the Drunk, a bedraggled river-rat whose two noteworthy features were his horrific claim to be Peggy Lee's brother, and his occasional ability to stand up straight. When Tommy played, it was considered a part of the decorum to spit in the chalk, manually re-adjust object balls to your liking, and slip him a cue without a tip. After all, Tommy expected all these ploys; they were his game-within-a-game, his version of hide-and-seek, and the rare moments when he would emerge from stupor to delightfully unearth those nefarious schemes against him were probably his most triumphant upon this earth. "Hee! Hee! I caughtcha." Grudgingly, Tommy's tormentors would return object balls to within 10 to 12 inches of where they properly belonged; in Peaches' case, 6 or 8 inches, for Peaches is a patient man.

Tommy would often pause in his action to deliver some unintelligible but undoubtedly heavy rhetoric. One night, as he did so digress, Peaches moved game ball 15 inches closer to the center of the end rail and replaced Tommy's cue with a sleek new model lacking not just tip but ferrule as well. Tommy lurched uncertainly back towards the table - this was on a 5-by-10, yet - seizes his new cue with a Quixote-like flourish, and with Peaches' case $3 on the line, sliced his game ball cleanly home, an almost-backwards cut shot, from 9-l/2 feet away. To watch Peaches' expression change as game ball slithered towards the black hole of his psyche was to know the purest of despair. While sweators howled till they got the dry heaves, Peaches managed to pay the bet off before sinking into a two-hour catatonic funk; never once did he move off the bench, the legend goes, nor change his position. Thar's them as swear he never even blinked.

On another occasion, Peaches found himself victimized by the concept of the pig-in-the-python. He knew the mark in question well enough to know he was not of Harvard or Choate stock; he was, rather, a local slob and tush hog, made more attractive this fine evening by an inability to find the end rail, and a bankroll that looked like a pygmy pumpkin. So Peaches equipped his prospect with a 9-ball handicap from another generation: "Safe-Eight", meaning that if le suckeur sinks the 8, the worst he can get in the game is a draw, even if the hustler makes the 9. It's a grind-away proposition of the old school, and Peaches built a modest bet into a score of $500 plus. By eight or nine the next morning, the bar was empty save for Peaches, the loser, and the loser's buddies. Two known wiseguys, both built like wrecking balls, came in and lo! the dawn, Peaches began to understand that he was scoring Mafia money.

One of the Capos saw Peaches' guppy sigh and pay off another $40, and sized up the situation with fearsome speed. "Why, you bleeper-bleeper!" he protested most strongly, and in the mouths of truly terrifying individuals, that particular epithet becomes a whole new word, and sounds like nothing else you ever heard in the language. "My God," thought Peaches, echoing distantly poor Col. Nicholson at the completed bridge on the River Kwai, "What have I done?"

The only out he saw was to let the guy win it back, a grind-away in reverse; he dared not to ask to raise the bet nor make the re-payment in lump sum, for the pre- payment penalties figured to be swift and severe. So back through the bankroll they went, 14 or15 games worth, Peaches now seen as doomed Orpheus pursuing his prized Eurydice eternally into Hell, running no more than two and having to stall at that. "The guy pulled even at three in the afternoon, and decided to go to sleep," Peaches recalls fondly. "So I feel like I came out ahead, because I'd have gladly thrown in a game or two for goodwill."

Even more intriguing than the lambkiller specie is the flock they prey upon. We're talking largely of bars now, I think; un-hustlers make some king-size scores off creatures who wouldn't be caught dead in a poolroom. Indeed, some of the most important money has changed hands when the lamb has invited the hustler (or un-hustler, as the case might be) back to his fine home to continue the session in private on a well-manicured table. Now the hustlers basically represent the game's lowest competitive plane - that is, if you can't beat one of these, where is there left to turn? - and one can't ignore the psychological inferences in this. The losers in these clashes, after all, go home to three squares a day and a dry roof over their heads, while their victors continue to scrap for their existence. As the lambs in question thus have (a) no visible reason to gamble and (b) no chance whatsoever to win, I think we might conclude that these gents actively want loss and especially the pain that goes with it. Well! Are they not better off, then, bringing their suffering wish to us for highly skilled indulgence, rather than running off to the whores for a good spanking? We're infinitely better company.

Mencken once said, "No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public," and P.T. Barnum said, "There's a sucker born every minute." And neither of those gentlemen, it's worth noting, could run three balls.