clash royale hack
HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
Tips & shafts
By George Fels
Consulting Editor George Fels has been writing for Billiards Digest since 1980, and his "Tips & Shafts" column is usually our readers' first stop when they crack open the magazine. For better or worse, pool has been his only mistress for 40-plus years.

• May 2021
• April 2021
• March 2021
• February 2021
• January 2021
• December 2020
• November 2020
• October 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• June 2020
• April 2020
• March 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• December 2019
• November 2019
• October 2019
• September 2019
• August 2019
• July 2019
• June 2019
• May 2019
• April 2019
• March 2019
• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• July 2018
• July 2018
• June 2018
• May 2018
• April 2018
• March 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• November 2017
• October 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• May 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• December 2015
• November 2015
• October 2015
• September 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• May 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• July 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008

Best of Fels
August: Swinging at Strikes
August 2010
A FEW months back, I wrote a piece about the folly of selling my wife on pool via the pure beauty of Willie Mosconi's play in an exhibition match. Shortly thereafter, a reader suggested that I devote an entire column to that play, and exactly why it was different from that of his peers.

So you'd like to play the way he did? Well, as it happens, I can tell you how to do that. But given pool's complexity, what I set down here is not going to convert you into a champion, any more than the immortal (and frequently insufferable) Ted Williams' batting advice is going to turn you into major league baseball's next .350 hitter. All Williams ever said about his prowess, for the record, was, "Swing at strikes."

Mosconi was similarly stingy with playing tips. He did offer the equally worthless advice, "Don't miss," as his friend and frequent second banana Jimmy Caras did, and he also counseled novices to "always play with better players" and "practice the circle drill." All that would have disappointed the daylights out of me had I been the one asking for help, but that was pretty much as articulate as he ever got regarding instruction.

Where would you begin, then, if your mission were to emulate the all-time champion? You'd logically start with new cloth; as for the balls, you'd want them not just new but extremely highly polished. Mosconi's personal cue case also carried his personal set of balls. None of this is meant to denigrate the man's genius in any way; those are simply the playing conditions on which he insisted. (Tight pockets don't enter into this in any way whatsoever; the advent of Gold Crown tables slowed him down not one quark.)

Logically enough, this meant he never had to hit anything very hard, not even his break shots. Any number of today's top 14.1 players - which means the Europeans - favor drawing the cue ball all the way up to the head rail and back out again in breaking the balls open. In addition to horrifying the straight-pool purists in the gallery, this technique carries several pitfalls. There's the possibility of scratching in either of the top pockets, and then there's the near-certainty of creating mini-clusters along the three rails surrounding the rack area because the break shot was so drastically over-hit. Mosconi, by contrast, rarely drove more than six or seven balls out of the stack initially, and almost never opened the full pile with his first break.

Where his game began to deviate from the rest was in picking off the loose balls before attempting a secondary break shot. The vast majority of today's players go after the cluster(s) first, in an attempt to get all the balls open. But because Mosconi wasn't sending any balls all that far from where they were originally racked, and he was extremely confident in his position play, he would usually reduce the table to the still-clustered balls, an open shot with which to separate them, and an "insurance" ball that he'd have available to shoot no matter where the newly-separated balls went. Further, while he virtually never broke the balls hard enough to send an object ball past a side pocket, he had no compunctions about turning around and shooting balls into the two top pockets. And when he'd cut a ball, say, to his right, and take off to his left to meet the cue ball, it almost looked like they were dancing the tango.

As for the magic he'd create with his overall position sequences, I've already covered a lot of that. Mosconi would identify the four balls nearest the four corner pockets, and try to follow a route that connected those; there would always be balls on the table that could be categorized that way. The first exception to that pattern that he would permit himself was that he would strive to leave one ball, and only one, on the bottom rail until all the rest were open. (That way, in case a secondary break shot happened to leave his cue ball down there, he'd have welcome company.) Thus his cue ball seemed to be "circling" the remaining object balls, gradually closing in on his break shot for the next frame. Rarely did he play position for the ball next to the one he was calling; instead, he'd "leapfrog" to position for another shot two or three balls away, and the balls he had just passed over automatically became his ubiquitous insurance balls. The other deviation from his circular patterns was a diagonal path into the still-clustered balls, the move I privately labeled "Cutting Across Midtown." And he always preferred the side of the rack for his break shots - I honestly cannot remember ever seeing him send such a shot into a side pocket, as Ralph Greenleaf was said to choose - just as he preferred to go off the balls rather than through them, although he certainly had the stroke for the latter.

Because the champion rarely moved the balls very far in separating them, a great many of his runs seemed quite similar to one another - and, in fact, they were. His play was utterly predictable, and ironically that's a great part of what made it such fun to watch. Within 15 or 20 minutes of watching, you could call his next six shots. And you could take your girlfriend, or kid, or anyone else uninitiated to pool to a Mosconi exhibition, and make the semi-promise, "Tonight you're very likely going to see a guy make a hundred shots in a row." There has been no competitor since for whom the same claim could be made with anywhere near the same certainty.

What else do you need to be the next Willie Mosconi incarnation? You'll only require perfect vision (he never wore glasses), a slip-stroke, a remarkable touch, an even more remarkable visualizing ability, and a white-heat hatred of losing. And that's it! Go be Mosconi. And remember, swing at strikes.