HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
From the Publisher
By Mike Panozzo
Mike became editor of Billiards Digest in 1980 and liked it so much that he bought the company. He has served on the Billiard Congress of America board of directors and as president of the Billiard & Bowling Institute of America.


Archives
• March 2024
• February 2024
• January 2024
• December 2023
• November 2023
• October 2023
• September 2023
• August 2023
• July 2023
• June 2023
• May 2023
• April 2023
• March 2023
• February 2023
• January 2023
• December 2022
• November 2022
• October 2022
• September 2022
• August 2022
• July 2022
• June 2022
• May 2022
• April 2022
• March 2022
• February 2022
• January 2022
• December 2021
• November 2021
• October 2021
• September 2021
• August 2021
• July 2021
• June 2021
• May 2021
• April 2021
• March 2021
• February 2021
• January 2021
• December 2020
• November 2020
• October 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• July 2020
• June 2020
• May 2020
• April 2020
• March 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• December 2019
• November 2019
• October 2019
• September 2019
• August 2019
• July 2019
• June 2019
• May 2019
• April 2019
• March 2019
• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• August 2018
• July 2018
• June 2018
• May 2018
• April 2018
• March 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• November 2017
• October 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• May 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• Dec 2015
• Nov 2015
• Oct 2015
• Sept 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• May 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
 
September: Media Rights
September 2009
DESPITE ALL the criticism that the media withstands on a daily basis it's too controversial, it's too soft, it overreacts, it misinforms, etc. the media occasionally gets it right.

(By now you're thinking, "Okay, this is where the media pats itself on the back." Admit it. That's what you're thinking, right?)

I think the billiard media deserves a pat on the back.

(Fine. You were right. Happy now?)

I'm the first to admit that the media should report the news, not be the news. But when the media bands together to do something positive, I think it deserves to be noted.

Two and a half years ago, a group of people who cover the sport through various media - magazines, Web sites, video, announcing - joined together to form the United States Billiard Media Association. Admittedly, the initial push to form the media association was directed toward a single goal - to take over stewardship of voting for the Billiard Congress of America Hall of Fame. (The USBMA's greater purpose is to elevate the visibility and status of the sport, and to provide support for its members against obstruction of free speech.) The sport/industry's media members overwhelmingly felt that the BCA's voting procedure - in which Hall of Fame nominees were voted into the Hall by the association's "voting members" - was outdated, and the voters largely unqualified. Where at one time the BCA's voting membership was made up primarily of cuemakers and table manufacturers, most of whom where directly involved in pro tournaments, the association had evolved into a membership heavily skewed toward product manufacturers with little attachment to the sport side of billiards.

The USBMA role as gatekeepers of the Hall of Fame resulted in a shift of voter eligibility to media members, historians, promoters and Hall of Famers. Few will argue that the most deserving players have been elected to the BCA Hall of Fame in the three years since the formation of the USBMA.

But the USBMA recently took a much larger and more active role in the Hall of Fame arena, one that deserves recognition.

The BCA's announcement in August 2008 that it was suspending funding for the annual Hall of Fame banquet raised two possibilities: one, that 2009 inductees would enter the Hall un-feted, or two, that the lack of ceremony would prevent elections at all.

Over the course of several months and numerous e-mail exchanges, the USBMA membership determined that electing players who have devoted their lives to the game into the BCA Hall of Fame without proper pomp was unacceptable. The membership voted to produce the Hall of Fame banquet on its own. Media members have offered their time and resources to help properly welcome 2009 inductees Johnny Archer and Allison Fisher into the BCA Hall of Fame. Barry Behrman and the U.S. Open 9-Ball Championships have graciously offered to play host to the banquet, to the point of suspending matches so that as many fans and players as possible can attend. It should be a grand night.

But could you imagine Archer and Fisher, the best players of their generation, being elected into the Hall of Fame and receiving their symbolic green blazers and commemorative plaques and rings in the mail? (The BCA would never have trivialized the inductions to that extent, but you get the point.)

And the point here is that the sport and industry can be proud of its media members. The people who cover billiards may make stands and hoist opinions that not everyone agrees with, but they're also willing to back up their convictions with action.

MORE VIDEO...