HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
From the Publisher
By Mike Panozzo
Mike became editor of Billiards Digest in 1980 and liked it so much that he bought the company. He has served on the Billiard Congress of America board of directors and as president of the Billiard & Bowling Institute of America.


Archives
• March 2024
• February 2024
• January 2024
• December 2023
• November 2023
• October 2023
• September 2023
• August 2023
• July 2023
• June 2023
• May 2023
• April 2023
• March 2023
• February 2023
• January 2023
• December 2022
• November 2022
• October 2022
• September 2022
• August 2022
• July 2022
• June 2022
• May 2022
• April 2022
• March 2022
• February 2022
• January 2022
• December 2021
• November 2021
• October 2021
• September 2021
• August 2021
• July 2021
• June 2021
• May 2021
• April 2021
• March 2021
• February 2021
• January 2021
• December 2020
• November 2020
• October 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• July 2020
• June 2020
• May 2020
• April 2020
• March 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• December 2019
• November 2019
• October 2019
• September 2019
• August 2019
• July 2019
• June 2019
• May 2019
• April 2019
• March 2019
• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• August 2018
• July 2018
• June 2018
• May 2018
• April 2018
• March 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• November 2017
• October 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• May 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• Dec 2015
• Nov 2015
• Oct 2015
• Sept 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
 
May: Upon Closer Inspection
May 2014
AT FIRST, I was a little confused. (Oh, stop it!) The posts and stories sounded pretty impressive. $75,000 prize fund in Louisiana! $20,000 first prize in Missouri! $15,000 first prize in Texas. I thought to myself, "Geez, maybe the tournament scene in the U.S. is picking up!" For a minute, it was exciting. For a minute.

Then I read the small print. That tournament in Louisiana with the $75,000 pot? It was called the White Diamond Bar Table 9-Ball Championship, and it featured a whopping $1,000 in added money.

The kicker, of course, was a monster Calcutta.

Calcuttas were a big thing at tournaments in the '80s, but they seemed to fall out of fashion in the '90s and 2000s. Not sure why. They seem to be back in full force today. For the uninitiated, a Calcutta is an auction. Prior to the tournament, the stake horses and gamblers bid on players. A player's name is presentedsay, Shane Van Boeningand bidding begins. Shane's final position in the tournament goes to the highest bidder, and the money is put into the Calcutta pool.

Yeah, it's a lot like going to Christie's or Sotheby's. Shane is what you might classify as a Mona Lisa. Lesser players, of course, go for significantly less, sometimes being sold in pairs or lots. It's all based on the chances of cashing. A percentage is set for the Calcutta dispersementtypically 30-40 percent for first place, paying down 12-16 spots. At some events, a second Calcutta will be run after the field is whittled down to the final 16.

In essence, it's a prize fund for gamblers. Players are usually afforded the opportunity to by 50 percent of themselves from the winning bidder. In the case of a player like Van Boening, that price could be pretty steep. But if a sleeper goes for a pittance in the Calcutta, buys half of himself, then wins the tournament? Payday.

The Calcutta payout for first place in Louisiana was $24,000. First prize in the event itself was $2,100less than 10 percent.

What's interesting to me, with social media and camera phones, is how out-in-the-open Calcuttas are. I mean, it's gambling, right? And, yes, Calcuttas are illegal in most states. And even in the states in which "player auctions" are allowed, these room owners and tournament directors had better pray that the IRS isn't following pool forums on the Internet.

Now, to that $20,000 top prize event. The Smokin' Aces Bar Box 9-Ball Championship featured $0 in added money. That's right. Zippo. Instead, a "limited" field of 16 players posted $2,000 each and played race-to-21. The prize fund breakdown was $20,000 for first, $7,000 for second and $5,000 for third. For everyone else, thanks for stopping by!

So, this is the face of tournament pool in the U.S. today. Players playing for their own money. Can it get worse?

MORE VIDEO...