clash royale hack
HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
From the Publisher
By Mike Panozzo
Mike became editor of Billiards Digest in 1980 and liked it so much that he bought the company. He has served on the Billiard Congress of America board of directors and as president of the Billiard & Bowling Institute of America.

• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• August 2018
• July 2018
• June 2018
• May 2018
• April 2018
• March 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• November 2017
• October 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• May 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• Dec 2015
• Nov 2015
• Oct 2015
• Sept 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• May 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
Apr: Show Them The Money
April 2015

It's getting harder to tell the hustlers from the hustled these days.

Professional pool players catch a lot of grief from fans, industry types and promoters - for having bad attitudes; for doing "business;" for a perceived lack of respect for the game; for not always looking like professional athletes. Some of the criticism is deserved, most of it isn't.

But one thing you can't fault the players for is their willingness to take people's words at face value. They are, in a way, surprisingly trusting. And surprisingly accepting.

How else could you explain their attitudes and perseverance in the face of tournament promoters who continually come up short on promises?

The recent buzz around the pool world centers on a pair of well-known promoters who have had problems fulfilling promises made to the players. First, there are the well-chronicled woes of the U.S. Open 9-Ball Championship. Promoter Barry Behrman "guarantees" a healthy prize fund each year, but when it comes time to pay the players, shortfalls seem to be the order of the day. Over the past decade, a sizeable percentage of cashing players have been subjected to late payments, many times in installments over several months.

Having to wait an inordinate amount of time to be paid from a tournament in which player entry fees make up more than half of the prize fund is not only unfair, it is a genuine hardship for many. Being a "professional" these days isn't easy. Most of the players live a hand-to-mouth existence.

And how do the players react? There is always disappointment and, in some cases, disgust. And they always threaten to boycott the next year's Open. But they also grudgingly accept their fate and wait for the checks. And they always show up in Virginia the next October.

The pros did take matters into their own hands in 2013, when they forced Behrman to allow Hall of Famer Johnny Archer and Chicago attorney Dennis Walsh to handle the prize fund. Player payouts were made in full, although not without a few tense moments. And in a move that may well save the U.S. Open in future years, Behrman is allowing Accu-Stats founder Pat Fleming to handle the collection and disbursement of all prize monies in 2015. One of the game's most respected figures, Fleming's participation will certainly quell player angst. Still, even in years when his payouts were delayed, Behrman, to his credit, eventually paid every player.

The same can't be said for the promoters of the recent pool double-header in the Philippines, where boxing champion and pool benefactor Manny Pacquiao staged the World Pool-Billiard Association-sanctioned World 10-Ball Championship, and immediately followed that event up with a doubles 10-ball tournament. The first event, that the Pacquiao camp all but begged the WPA to allow them to produce, was to feature a $200,000 prize fund. The doubles event offered a $100,000 prize fund. Obviously, the money was significant enough to draw players from around the world.

When it came time to pay out the prize money, however, approximately $10,000 was missing. According to several players, the promoters (the boxer's brother, Bobby, and his wife, Lorelei, reportedly were in charge of the event) informed the cashing players that five percent of their winnings had been withheld to pay the WPA sanctioning fee. The odd thing is, the WPA actually allowed the promoters to charge an entry fee for the event for that very purpose. (Traditionally, WPA World Championships do not charge an entry fee to the qualified players and pay the sanctioning fee separately from the prize fund.)

"I can assure everyone that the WPA certainly did not receive any part of this money," WPA President, Ian Anderson said in a letter posted on "The WPA charged an entry fee in lieu of any sanction fee being deducted. Whoever decided to take the money had no right to do so. To add any other fee after the event is announced is wrong, but to do so after the event has completed is totally wrong and unacceptable."

The WPA, pool's world governing body, is investigating, but don't hold your breath. The association has neither the means nor the legal footing to do much about promoters who fail to live up to promises. They can choose to not do business with those promoters in the future, but not much more. Ah, but the double-dipping wasn't finished.

Prior to the start of the doubles event (which was not a WPA-sanctioned tournament) - but after the 56 teams ponied up their $300-per-team entry fee - the Pacman promoters announced that the $100,000 prize fund had been reduced to $60,000. Just like that. Between the World 10-Ball and the Pacman Doubles, the Pacquiaos saved themselves (or their benevolent brother) $50,000!

Of course, the players shrugged their shoulders in resignation, screwed together their cues and played they always do. Unfortunately, this is the world of professional pool in which we live. The players, too often vilified, are at the mercy of promoters who are not held accountable.

They deserve better.