HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
From the Publisher
By Mike Panozzo
Mike became editor of Billiards Digest in 1980 and liked it so much that he bought the company. He has served on the Billiard Congress of America board of directors and as president of the Billiard & Bowling Institute of America.


Archives
• March 2024
• February 2024
• January 2024
• December 2023
• November 2023
• October 2023
• September 2023
• August 2023
• July 2023
• June 2023
• May 2023
• April 2023
• March 2023
• February 2023
• January 2023
• December 2022
• November 2022
• October 2022
• September 2022
• August 2022
• July 2022
• June 2022
• May 2022
• April 2022
• March 2022
• February 2022
• January 2022
• December 2021
• November 2021
• October 2021
• September 2021
• August 2021
• July 2021
• June 2021
• May 2021
• April 2021
• March 2021
• February 2021
• January 2021
• December 2020
• November 2020
• October 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• July 2020
• June 2020
• May 2020
• April 2020
• March 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• December 2019
• November 2019
• October 2019
• September 2019
• August 2019
• July 2019
• June 2019
• May 2019
• April 2019
• March 2019
• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• July 2018
• June 2018
• May 2018
• April 2018
• March 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• November 2017
• October 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• May 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• Dec 2015
• Nov 2015
• Oct 2015
• Sept 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• May 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
 
August: Where Do We Go From Here?
August 2018

As much as I love the sport side of the billiard industry, I’ve always enjoyed the business side just as much. It’s a dynamic business, with manufacturers, distributors, brick and mortar retail locations and poolrooms making up a unique distribution chain.

Oddly enough, the sport side of pool hasn’t changed a bit over the 38 years I’ve been involved. I could pull out tournament stories and editorials from 20 years ago, and they’d fit right into today’s state of pool.

Not so with the business side of pool. For a variety of reasons, from consolidation and production costs to the Internet and video games, the billiard business has under massive chance over the past 25 years. Hardly a surprise, given that so many mature businesses went through similar changes during that period.

The recent Billiard Congress of America Billiard and Home Leisure Expo in New Orleans, the 34th rendition of the industry’s annual trade gathering, was a stark reminder of just how much the business side of billiards has, indeed, changed.

Of course, the most obvious reality is that the industry has shrunk at every level. The number of retail stores devoted primarily to the sale of billiard products has dipped well below 1,000, and the number of poolrooms continues to dwindle. Most shocking, however, is the virtual evaporation of American manufacturers producing billiard products. The size of the 2018 BCA Expo was not much different than the size of the inaugural BCA Expo in 1984, held in Fort Worth, Texas. The 2018 Expo featured 74 exhibitors and 800 or so retail buyers. The 1984 BCA Trade Show had 70 exhibitors, 500 retail buyers and more than 100 poolrooms represented.

The differences? Less than half of the exhibitors in 2018 displayed what I consider to be core billiard products (tables, cues and accessories), and only a handful actually manufacture in the U.S. In 1984, the trade show was almost entirely billiard products, and featured dozens of table makers and cue makers manufacturing in the U.S.

Now, I have nothing against other home gameroom and leisure products being shown and marketed at the BCA Expo. And I understand the proliferation of overseas manufacturing of billiard products. But, having attended all 34 industry trade shows, I barely feel like I’m in the billiard industry any longer.

That was only one of the observations that stuck with me following the three-day showcase in New Orleans. The majority of discussion regarding the show centered on buyer traffic — or the lack thereof. The party line, as has been the case in recent years, is that the buyers that attended the expo, while few in numbers, were the industry’s top dealers and were there to spend money.

For the most part, that is true. The buyers who took the time to attend rolled the aisles like shoppers at midnight on Thanksgiving. They had ample time to wade through booths and more than enough leverage to assure themselves great deals.

But for every store that was represented in New Orleans, there were six or seven that weren’t. Naturally, no trade show is going to get 100 percent attendance from its buying universe, but with the billiard pie becoming smaller each year, it seems more important than ever that the BCA and its members find ways to draw greater attendance.

In the past, it’s been thought that a mix of sites would tempt buyers, but the light turnout in New Orleans was a telling sign. Not having been to the always-popular Big Easy since 2002, the BCA held out hope that a return to the city, coupled with the claims that the billiard business has rebounded, would spark more interest than recent dalliances with Louisville and suburban Chicago. Instead, it was clear that only Las Vegas creates a spike in attendance.

With sites not impacting attendance, discussion in New Orleans turned to the season selected for the annual Expo. Although the first BCA trade shows were in May, the dates shifted to July when the Expo became big enough to demand Las Vegas as a destination. Settling on July was a purely financial decision, with mid-summer convention dates offering the most favorable exhibit hall prices.

Proponents of moving the Expo to spring dates trumpet the need to attract the coveted and powerful pool and spa retailers (reportedly purchasers of more than half of the pool tables sold in the U.S.), who are too busy selling pools to leave their businesses in July.

Would a shift in dates do the trick? Spring dates would likely result in higher exhibit hall and hotel rates around the country, but it is probably still worth the gamble. Something has to push more buyers into the aisles.

What else could help? How about making a more concerted effort to re-connect with poolroom owners. Lord knows they can use some guidance in their struggle to stay relevant. And the promise of a hundred or so room owners would open the door to an entirely new category of potential exhibitors.

Either way, it’s time that the BCA and its members get creative and even take a few risks. Rightfully so, the association tries to run every expo “on budget.” Problem is, it continually budgets for smaller shows and appears satisfied with “meeting budget.” It’s time to gamble a little before we meet budget of zero.

MORE VIDEO...