HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
From the Publisher
By Mike Panozzo
Mike became editor of Billiards Digest in 1980 and liked it so much that he bought the company. He has served on the Billiard Congress of America board of directors and as president of the Billiard & Bowling Institute of America.


Archives
• March 2024
• February 2024
• January 2024
• December 2023
• November 2023
• October 2023
• September 2023
• August 2023
• July 2023
• June 2023
• May 2023
• April 2023
• March 2023
• February 2023
• January 2023
• December 2022
• November 2022
• October 2022
• September 2022
• August 2022
• July 2022
• June 2022
• May 2022
• April 2022
• March 2022
• February 2022
• January 2022
• December 2021
• November 2021
• October 2021
• September 2021
• August 2021
• July 2021
• June 2021
• May 2021
• April 2021
• March 2021
• February 2021
• January 2021
• December 2020
• November 2020
• October 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• July 2020
• June 2020
• May 2020
• April 2020
• March 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• December 2019
• November 2019
• October 2019
• September 2019
• August 2019
• July 2019
• June 2019
• May 2019
• April 2019
• March 2019
• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• August 2018
• July 2018
• June 2018
• May 2018
• April 2018
• March 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• November 2017
• October 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• May 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• Dec 2015
• Nov 2015
• Oct 2015
• Sept 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• May 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
 
June: Political 8-ball
June 2016

God knows I’ve tried! Over the years, I’ve been known to take a shot or three at the World Pool-Billiard Association, the recognized governing body for pocket billiards in the World Confederation of Billiard Sports. The WPA always appeared to me to be nothing but a small, billiard version of its paternal International Olympic Committee — self-absorbed and visionless, with a touch of greed sprinkled on top. A “Mini Me,” so to speak.

In recent years, I’ve tried to better understand the WPA. Its president, former Australian snooker pro Ian Anderson, is a pleasant guy. And I don’t doubt that he sincerely wants the best for the sport. The WPA is not a wealthy governing body. It cannot produce its own tournaments, like World Snooker, the commercial arm of the World Professional Billiard and Snooker Association. It essentially waits for promoters to express interest in running a sanctioned world championship, and then tries to accommodate the promoters. Eventually, concern for the players seeps into the equation.

Because of these realities, I realize in many cases the WPA is at the mercy of the promoters. But, geez, guys, at some point ethics and vision should find a way into your decision process!

As reported in Wing Shots (pg. 12), the previously announced WPA World 8-Ball Championships in Toronto, Canada, in August, has been shelved. Pending the official signing of an agreement, the World 8-Ball Championships will instead be held in China later in the year. Why the change?

Well, since you asked…

Let me start by pointing out that the World 8-Ball Championship hasn’t been held since 2012, and was held only sporadically in the years prior to that. In other words, promoters haven’t exactly been breaking down the doors at WPA world headquarters to underwrite the event. Enter Jim Wych. Wych is best known to pool fans as the primary play-by-play man for most of the televised Matchroom Sport events, including the World Pool Masters and the Mosconi Cup. He is straight-forward and sincere. He loves the cue sports and the players who excel at them. Wych is also part owner of a large poolroom and sports bar in Toronto, the Corner Bank. After putting together a sponsorship group, Wych contacted the WPA about reviving the World 8-Ball Championship in Toronto. After more than meeting the criteria required to gain sanctioning for the event, the WPA awarded the tournament to Wych and his group. An official announcement was issued by the WPA in March.

“Two weeks later I received a phone call from Ian Anderson,” said Wych. “He told me there was a deal on the table with China that he thought was for Chinese 8-ball. He said they threw him a curve saying their intent was for American 8-ball. That’s when the wheels came off.” According to Wych, the WPA tried to get him to give up the rights to the World 8-Ball Championship in favor of some other event. The rationale, he said, was that the Chinese promoters were willing to commit to five years and $3 million, with $300,000 prize funds being awarded for both a men’s and women’s division in each of the five years.

Not surprisingly, Wych felt corner hooked. He certainly had the right to hold onto the event, but to what end?

“In the end,” he said, “I didn’t have the first right for a second, third or fourth year. I didn’t want a one-off event. We’re trying to build an annual thing here. I knew the WPA would take the event directly to China next year and there wouldn’t be anything I could do about it.”

So, in sports parlance, Wych took one for the team. And you know what? It was probably the right decision.

Thing is, he never should have been put in the position of having to make that decision. Shame on the WPA for its pettiness, greed and lack of ethics. I wouldn’t want to buy a house from these guys. If a better offer came around before closing, I’m sure they’d find a way to rescind the original contract and grab the bigger paycheck. Of course, the argument will be that this is best for the players, because lord knows the WPA always puts the welfare of the players first! (Tongue firmly planted in cheek.) It’s not like the event in Toronto was going to be run on a shoestring. There is every expectation that the Wych-produced event would have been every bit as good and as well-funded as most WPA events. Additionally, this was an opportunity for the WPA to bring a world championship back to the Western Hemisphere! I don’t know about everyone else, but that is every bit as important to me as the prize fund. Want to increase pool’s visibility in the media and among players in North America? This continent hasn’t hosted a world championship since 2010 (World Straight Pool), and hasn’t hosted one of the higher profile division championships since the turn of the century. Again, a lack of vision. Also, I find it hard to believe that a promoter willing to put $3 million into the game would not have listened to other options.

To date, no paperwork has actually been signed. I hope for the WPA’s sake, this deal is everything they apparently said it was going to be. You’ve already alienated one promoter whose interest was purely for the sport.

MORE VIDEO...