clash royale hack
HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
From the Publisher
By Mike Panozzo
Mike became editor of Billiards Digest in 1980 and liked it so much that he bought the company. He has served on the Billiard Congress of America board of directors and as president of the Billiard & Bowling Institute of America.

• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• August 2018
• July 2018
• June 2018
• May 2018
• April 2018
• March 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• November 2017
• October 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• May 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• Dec 2015
• Nov 2015
• Oct 2015
• Sept 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• May 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
November: Release Me
November 2012
ADMITTEDLY, I confuse more easily than the average American.

(I'm still trying to figure out why there's Braille on the ATM machine in my bank's drive-thru lane!)

And one of the most perplexing conundrums I'm dealing with these days is deciphering the meaning of the Association of Billiard Professionals' constant media blitz. The ABP churns out press releases like the Republican National Committee. I keep waiting for the TV commercial blitz, with ABP mouthpiece/promoter/player/spin master/tennis junkie/serial Facebook poster Charlie Williams announcing, "I'm Charlie Williams, and I approved this message."

What I still don't get, however, is exactly who the ABP is and what they stand for.

The ABP formed several years ago, at the urging of respected longtime pro Johnny Archer, to great fanfare after a string of unfulfilled promises and shaky tournaments caused a dozen top pro players to throw up their hands and scream, "Enough! The players are tired of being used and taken for granted."

At the time, that simple, singular message sounded like a great premise for a unified front. The group wasn't starting a tour, demanding more money or threatening to become an exclusive club. The original idea was to better relations between players and promoters to ensure a sense of stability in the pro ranks.

A noble cause, indeed. But as is often the case with professional pool players, the group quickly got ahead of itself. Soon it was claiming "membership" and unwavering support from players across the globe, young and old. It began pushing its own rules, insisting on seeding based on its own rankings and started throwing around terms like "health coverage" and "401K."

Most notably, the ABP continually intimated that it spoke for numerous players without reservation.

The truth is, the ABP, by its own admission, has less than two dozen paid members. On countless occasions, the association has claimed to speak on behalf of players who later claim no registered affiliation with the group.

Not that those instances are of any real consequence.

In an age of dwindling tour stops, dwindling prize funds and dwindling exposure, the ABP seems hell bent on establishing relevance. Its proprietary ranking system is at the forefront, for obvious reasons. A recognized ranking system is leverage. If ABP rankings had value, ABP-sanctioned events (and any event with $7,000 added qualifies), by extension, would have value. The problem is that with previous few events taking place in the U.S., rankings matter only for exclusive overseas tournaments. And so long as the Billiard Congress of America is the recognized national federation of the World Pool Association, the BCA rankings are trump.

Still, the ABP goes to great lengths to promote its rankings. In a recent release, the group cheered the fact that its rankings would be one of three sets of rankings used to seed players at the U.S. Open 9-Ball Championships. Now there's something to hang your hat on.

The ABP also suffers from the widely held perception that what's good for the ABP is good for both the promoter and players who play under the Dragon Promotions banner. At least half of the ABP's board is made up of players in William's Dragon Promos lair. The natural argument is that a recognized ABP will make Dragon Promotions tournaments more important, and more profitable.

Whether the argument has merit is irrelevant. Perception is reality. Most industry insiders agree that Williams' ink is all over ABP press releases. As long as he's an independent promoter, Williams would be better off distancing himself from the group.

When it sticks to its original mantra, the ABP has done good things. Last year the group initially threatened to boycott the U.S. Open. Cooler heads prevailed and the ABP instead enlisted the BCA to oversee the collection of entry fees for the event, which has had a history of falling short on payout day. And the group gave players fair warning of potential problems with an announced World 10-Ball tournament in Asia just weeks before the promoters postponed the event. (But even in that instance, the ABP seemed to take joy more in the demise of the WPA-sanctioned tournament than in trying to work with the WPA to ensure better communication and increase the potential of a successful event.)

The ABP should stick to its original mission and establish its credibility that way before it pushes ahead into universal control mode. It should work on becoming a true players association before it portends to speak for all players. As it stands, the ABP is little more than a handful of players with a logo and a penchant for knee-jerk reaction.

And it should pull back on meaningless, attention-seeking press releases filled with monumental boasts.

They're confusing.