clash royale hack
HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
From the Publisher
By Mike Panozzo
Mike became editor of Billiards Digest in 1980 and liked it so much that he bought the company. He has served on the Billiard Congress of America board of directors and as president of the Billiard & Bowling Institute of America.

• June 2019
• May 2019
• April 2019
• March 2019
• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• August 2018
• July 2018
• June 2018
• May 2018
• April 2018
• March 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• November 2017
• October 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• May 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• Dec 2015
• Nov 2015
• Oct 2015
• Sept 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• May 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
September: Fame Shouldn’t Be Fleeting
September 2008
In last month's column, which came on the heels of the annual Billiard Congress of America trade show and Hall of Fame inductions, I suggested that the industry's gatekeepers consider allowing the Hall of Fame to operate independently. That notion probably needs to be explained in greater detail.

The premise of the argument that the Hall needs some autonomy is based on the stepchild treatment that the Hall of Fame and its members have received in recent years. What once was a dress-up banquet affair has been reduced to a half-time show. True, attendance at the Hall of Fame inductions had slipped over the years, while costs kept rising, but the problem is deeper than dollars and cents.

Nearly twice as many living Hall of Famers (10) didn't make the trip to Charlotte as did (six). Sure, the BCA contacted (or attempted to contact) each Hall of Fame member and offered airfare and lodging to attend. But several of those who took a pass on this year's induction ceremony noted that the BCA's generosity has been trimmed to airfare, a single night's stay and $100 spending money. Try selling that to a Hall of Famer in any other sport. Odds are they'd stay home too. Heck, the $100 would get burned up simply getting to and from the airport. (Not many years ago the BCA sent drivers to pick up each Hall of Famer from the airport, and happily delivered them back to the airport following the show.)

At the expo itself, the Hall of Famers were pretty much on their own. No trumpeted autograph sessions at the BCA booth, no announcements that a deity was in the house. The BCA did stage a nice VIP reception prior to the 9-ball finals for event sponsors and Hall of Famers, and the BCA booth did feature two leather couches and a sofa table that qualified as the "Hall of Fame Lounge."

Can't understand why the 10 absent Hall of Famers didn't get the same goose bumps that the six who attended must have gotten when the BCA called!

I'm sorry, but the Hall of Famers deserve better, if for no other reason than the fact that they are virtually forgotten about the other 51 weeks each year.

This is the billiard industry, folks. The pro tour doesn't have a retirement plan. Our legends aren't flush with money. Is it asking too much of the billiard industry to go out of its way once a year to spoil these people? To treat them like real heroes for three stinkin' days?

But the gravy days are long gone, and the BCA is struggling mightily to lead the billiard industry through some pretty dark days. It's under enormous pressure to help its members survive. So I actually understand if the association is a little preoccupied these days.

I'm just asking that the BCA reassess its commitment to the people they themselves call "legends" and "heroes."

The solution? Several years ago, the BCA found itself in a similar position with the Billiard Education Foundation, the BCA's charitable organization. No one on the BCA board of directors discounted the importance of junior programs and scholarships, but the BCA office simply wasn't able to devote the time necessary to develop programs like the Junior Nationals and Pool-In-School. So the board decided to let the BEF run its own office. It hired former pro and BEF trustee Laura Smith to administer the office, and it agreed to fund the BEF for three years. But it is up to Smith to grow the programs, sell sponsorships and develop fund-raising events.

The BEF still has a long way to go before it becomes a self-sustaining, vital entity, but at least it's being tended to 365 days a year by someone who's passionate about seeing it grow.

The BCA should consider a similar move with the Hall of Fame. Set aside some funds and entrust the Hall of Fame to a passionate full-time curator. The curator's job duties would include fund raising and sponsorships for the annual Hall of Fame induction ceremony. He or she would handle the logistics revolving around the ceremony and the attendance of the living Hall of Famers. Not enough there to justify a year-round job? He or she could be charged with uncovering and collecting articles that a Hall of Fame should have - historic documents, programs, trophies, cues, balls, etc. I'm guessing there are former players and families who would agree to part with the game's treasures if they knew those items would be preserved for others to admire. I know, the billiard industry doesn't have a permanent Hall of Fame, but that doesn't mean these items shouldn't be collected. Over time the BCA may begin thinking about a temporary or traveling Hall of Fame.

One thing is certain. I guarantee a full-time curator would make sure that every year, when they convene for the induction of their new brothers and sisters, the living Hall of Famers would be treated like royalty.