HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
From the Publisher
By Mike Panozzo
Mike became editor of Billiards Digest in 1980 and liked it so much that he bought the company. He has served on the Billiard Congress of America board of directors and as president of the Billiard & Bowling Institute of America.


Archives
• November 2024
• October 2024
• September 2024
• August 2024
• July 2024
• June 2024
• May 2024
• April 2024
• March 2024
• February 2024
• January 2024
• December 2023
• November 2023
• October 2023
• September 2023
• August 2023
• July 2023
• June 2023
• May 2023
• April 2023
• March 2023
• February 2023
• January 2023
• December 2022
• November 2022
• October 2022
• August 2022
• July 2022
• June 2022
• May 2022
• April 2022
• March 2022
• February 2022
• January 2022
• December 2021
• November 2021
• October 2021
• September 2021
• August 2021
• July 2021
• June 2021
• May 2021
• April 2021
• March 2021
• February 2021
• January 2021
• December 2020
• November 2020
• October 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• July 2020
• June 2020
• May 2020
• April 2020
• March 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• December 2019
• November 2019
• October 2019
• September 2019
• August 2019
• July 2019
• June 2019
• May 2019
• April 2019
• March 2019
• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• August 2018
• July 2018
• June 2018
• May 2018
• April 2018
• March 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• November 2017
• October 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• May 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• Dec 2015
• Nov 2015
• Oct 2015
• Sept 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• May 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
 
September: Break Dance
September 2022

Based on the ruckus on social media, one might think the European Open Pool Championship in Fulda last month included the unveiling of a seventh pocket. Or, as Earl Strickland champions, the elimination of side pockets!

“This completely changes the game!” came the chorus of responses.

First off, the changes to the break employed by Matchroom at the inaugural European Open weren’t exactly mind-blowing, why-didn’t-anyone-think-of-this-before revelations. Racking with the 9 on the spot has been used in tournaments for a number of years and has been the rule in all Euro Tour events for some time.

And the break box? Also been around and tested sporadically for years. In fact, the 2021 International Open used virtually the same format that Matchroom used in Germany — break box and 9 on the spot. (Incidentally, Shane Van Boening struggled mightily with the break in losing to Albin Ouschan in the semifinals in Norfolk, Va., last October, just as he did in the final in Germany.)

But because Matchroom events are so visible internationally and marketed so robustly, the format modification and resulting impact on the event were publicized, analyzed, and legitimized by fans around the globe for days on end. Even players, once eliminated from the event, took to social media to hail the latest efforts to make major 9-ball tournaments more competitive and interesting.

And I don’t have a problem with any of that on any level.

For starters, Matchroom, already the leader in big-money, high-visibility pro 9-ball tournaments for several decades, doubled down in 2022 with the addition of several new open tournaments, the creation of its own ranking system and a leadership role in convincing other promoters to join the journey to a full, structured and lucrative annual lineup of events.

With the calendar beginning to take shape, efforts turned to fine-tuning the competitive aspect of the events. What playing format supports the desire to reward the very best players, while at the same time showcasing all aspects of the game?

Traditionally played with the 1 on the spot and the break allowed anywhere in the kitchen, major 9-ball events had dissolved into break-and-run fests. Guaranteed of pocketing the wing ball (and often the 1 as well) and getting a predictable and cushy spread of the remaining balls, the game had become interesting, even to those who love watching beasts like Van Boening, Josh Filler and Jayson Shaw string together five-packs and six-packs like tying their shoes.

For me, one of the key benefits of Matchroom’s continued tinkering with the rules was the inclusion of top pro players in the process, which invariably would lead to buy-in from those same players if their suggestions were actually implemented. Don’t underestimate how important that is going forward.

The success of the new rules was lauded almost universally. The only real complaint by the players was the switch from templates to hand-racking for the final 16, a move every pro insisted was pointless and, indeed, detrimental more often than necessary. And, to its credit, Matchroom immediately announced that its open event going forward would use template racking from start to finish.

Some concern has been expressed that the pros will eventually uncover a way to “solve” this rack as well, as if pool is a Rubik’s Cube. But most pros agree that, regardless, the latest racking and breaking requirements will lead to more open breaks, more scratches on the break and more confounding ball layouts — all of which means tighter matches, more cat-and-mouse action, less predictability and more tension.

That was evident in Germany, where players looked physically and mentally exhausted after more than a few close matches.

The goal now will be to get all major 9-ball events to follow the same script.

So, you ask, is this really all such a big deal?

I’m here to say, “Yes.”

And here’s why.

Look at it from a “Big Picture” perspective. (Yeah, I really hate that cliché as well!)

Pool’s ability to grow to the next level (which Matchroom likes to promote as somewhere between professional darts and professional snooker, both of which it has steered to great heights) will be in making the sport greater than the sum of its parts. In other words, all of these little tweaks and changes and efforts pieced together will create a more exciting, more compelling, more uniform and, by extension, a more attractive total package to potential outside industry sponsors.

Lack of uniformity, organization and, of course, prize money have been the primary pitfalls preventing pool from garnering serious consideration from companies outside our little circle in the past. If the sport, the players and billiard industry partners can rectify those drawbacks through all these little improvements, pool will be far better positioned to take that critical next step to mainstream understanding and acceptance.

MORE VIDEO...