HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
From the Publisher
By Mike Panozzo
Mike became editor of Billiards Digest in 1980 and liked it so much that he bought the company. He has served on the Billiard Congress of America board of directors and as president of the Billiard & Bowling Institute of America.


Archives
• April 2024
• March 2024
• February 2024
• January 2024
• December 2023
• November 2023
• October 2023
• September 2023
• August 2023
• July 2023
• June 2023
• May 2023
• April 2023
• March 2023
• February 2023
• January 2023
• December 2022
• November 2022
• October 2022
• September 2022
• August 2022
• July 2022
• June 2022
• May 2022
• April 2022
• March 2022
• February 2022
• January 2022
• December 2021
• November 2021
• October 2021
• September 2021
• August 2021
• July 2021
• June 2021
• May 2021
• April 2021
• March 2021
• February 2021
• January 2021
• December 2020
• November 2020
• October 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• July 2020
• June 2020
• May 2020
• April 2020
• March 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• December 2019
• November 2019
• October 2019
• September 2019
• August 2019
• July 2019
• June 2019
• May 2019
• April 2019
• March 2019
• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• August 2018
• July 2018
• June 2018
• May 2018
• April 2018
• March 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• November 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• May 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• Dec 2015
• Nov 2015
• Oct 2015
• Sept 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• May 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
 
October: Détente
October 2017

So, what did we learn from the Great Moscow Experiment? It’s certainly not an overstatement to assert that Team USA has been the story of the year in 2017. From the hand wringing over the dismissal of Mark Wilson as Team USA captain after three years of trying to restore pride in the American pool program and attempting to build a team that could reclaim its Mosconi Cup glory, to the selection of a foreign coach — and former Team Europe coach to boot — as his replacement, to the team selection process and eventual lineup, Team USA has been the most discussed and debated subject for the past 10 months.

Now, with his team selected and the Mosconi Cup (which Team USA has lost nine times in the past 10 years) just two months off, captain/coach Johan Ruijsink set up a trip to Russia for some stiff international competition and a Mosconi Cup-style warm-up tournament. (Shane Van Boening, Dennis Hatch, Oscar Dominguez and Billy Thorpe made the junket. Team USA’s fifth player, Sky Woodward, cancelled his trip for family reasons and was replaced in Moscow by Corey Deuel.)

Ruijsink, who has worked as coach for the Russian pool federation for several years, managed to get the federation and promoters of the Kremlin Cup 10-ball tournament to subsidize Team USA’s participation in that event and to have the Americans remain in Moscow for a USA-Russia team challenge.

What American pool fans need to know about Ruijsink is that he is a meticulous planner and a detail-oriented coach. His plan was to put the Americans in rugged international competition in an unfamiliar place and see how they responded. Then he planned to pit them against Russia’s five top players in a team match.

It was a brilliant move for many reasons. First, it would give him a chance to see how his team worked as a unit. How would they get along? How would they bond? He needed to establish trust: trust between the players, and the players’ trust in him.

Additionally, the USA-Russia match — the Dream Challenge — would provide the American players with a firsthand look at Ruijsink’s handiwork. The Russian squad featured three teenagers, a 25-year-old and a 34-year-old. They all train under Ruijsink. Many uneducated pool fans scoffed at the opponent as being a less-than-formidable challenge for the Americans. The truth is, if a Mosconi Cup-style event was staged among European nations, the Russian five would be one of the betting favorites, behind only Poland and perhaps Holland. Check the record. All five Russian players are in the top 40 in Euro Tour rankings. Only Poland can claim a better five-player lineup. Through three days of training and competition, the Americans couldn’t help but notice how technically solid the Russians are, which, in turn, would bolster Ruijsink’s credibility as a coach in their eyes.

As for the event itself, Team USA struggled early against the Russians. The team lost several matches by a single game, despite having control of the table in the deciding rack. All along, Ruijsink could be seen sitting at the edge of the arena, his leg crossed, constantly jotting down notes in a notebook.

On the final day of the competition, Team USA found itself trailing 8-5 in the race-to-nine format. The team rallied to take the final four matches to earn a 9-8 victory. The American players hugged and hammed for photos clutching the Dream Challenge trophy, while Ruijsink discreetly slipped out of the frame.

Was it critical that Team USA win the Dream Challenge? Not at all. A win doesn’t mean they are ready to face the five best players Europe can put forward. And a loss would not have meant that they couldn’t win in Las Vegas in December. Still, there was a lot for Team USA to be excited about. Young Thorpe got his feet wet playing in a team atmosphere which, every player who has ever competed in a Mosconi Cup will tell you, is completely different than normal tournament play or action matches. Thorpe commented later that the pressure was intense. His teammates will undoubtedly caution him that the Mosconi Cup arena will make his experience in the Dream Challenge seem like a walk in the park.

Not unnoticed was Van Boening’s play and attitude in Russia. The Mosconi Cup has not been kind to America’s top player in the past. His overall perfomance is well below .500. People speculate that he feels too much pressure to carry the load. In Moscow it was obvious that Van Boening was relaxed and comfortable with his teammates, and it showed in his performance. He dominated in virtually every match he played. That is a good sign for Team USA.

What was critical to the Moscow trip was getting the players to think of themselves as a team. It was about building trust. It was about getting the players to put their complete faith in Ruijsink and to follow his instructions going forward without reservation. In that respect, Team USA hit a home run in Moscow.

Ruijsink plans to get together with his American charges again before December, and he will undoubtedly go to that notebook of his to continue the building process.

I watched the Moscow Experiment very closely, and it left me feeling very good about this year’s Mosconi Cup.

MORE VIDEO...