clash royale hack pixel gun 3d hack mobile legends
HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
From the Publisher
By Mike Panozzo
Mike became editor of Billiards Digest in 1980 and liked it so much that he bought the company. He has served on the Billiard Congress of America board of directors and as president of the Billiard & Bowling Institute of America.

• September 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• May 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• Dec 2015
• Nov 2015
• Oct 2015
• Sept 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• May 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
April: The Road to Nowhere
April 2011
THE BILLIARD Congress of America, amidst flagging membership and declining trade show numbers, recently determined that reducing the size of the board and downsizing the size of the office is the key to future growth. Oh, they also (for all practical purposes) jettisoned a program that was the closest thing to a strategic business plan that the association has had in decades.

In effect, the BCA voted to take a bunker mentality in hopes that the industry's health improves in spite of itself.

The January meeting of the BCA board of directors (a meeting whose tenor, according to numerous directors, ranged from "contentious" to "not real happy" to "unprofessional"), at which the directors implemented the aforementioned reductions and voted not to renew the contract with bowling's Strike Ten Entertainment to run BCA's BankShot Entertainment marketing program (see BD News, pg. 8), moved the BCA closer to becoming nothing more than an annual trade show.

Smaller board. Smaller offices. Smaller minds.

The board's mindset these days seems to be, "We have $700,000 in the bank. If we don't spend a dime outside the trade show, which currently is the BCA's sole revenue producer, we can sustain the association longer."

You see, even with the annual BCA Expo, the association is running at a deficit. By reducing and/or eliminating all the programs that actually make the BCA the industry's de facto guardian, the board figures the association can stay alive at least until 2020, when what's left of the BCA Expo will be held in a three-car garage in Sandusky.

In my eyes, the board is utterly missing the point and is fundamentally altering the BCA's mission and obligation to the industry for the worse. According to the BCA web site, the association's mission is to "enhance the success of BCA members and promote the sport of billiards." Somewhere along the way, the board has gotten it into its collective heads that "billiard industry" means manufacturers and retailers, period. At board meetings they even split into two groups "trade" and "play.' What does that even mean? Billiard rooms and players aren't part of the BCA? They have no bearing on manufacturers and retailers? They are not part of the collective "we?"

Here's a reminder for the board. The reason no one in the U.S. (outside of BCA Expo attendees) knows who the BCA is anymore is because the association became obsessed with the trade show. Through its general disinterest in rooms and its wholesale divestiture of the BCA league system, the BCA board of directors managed to make the BCA irrelevant to the two largest categories in the industry.

Which brings me to BankShot Entertainment. Last year the BCA, realizing it could no longer rely solely on the trade show, engaged the help of Strike Ten Entertainment to create a meaningful benefits program for billiard rooms, while at the same time developing a revenue stream for the BCA. That was BankShot Entertainment. Through STE, the BCA gained national partnerships with Coca-Cola, First Data merchant services and Sysco food services. It was a big-picture idea - increasing room memberships, re-connecting with players, attracting outside-industry business partners, adding bodies and relevance to the Expo - that addressed the association's mission...and future.

The BCA says it spent $240,000 on BankShot in 2010, and, quite frankly, the results were miserable. I know, because I was part of the BSE effort. The rollout took too long. Expectations were unreasonably high. The cost was high.

Still, momentum was starting to build. Room owners, who either had no clue what the BCA was or had long since considered the association irrelevant, were starting to listen. Brand awareness was growing. To me, BSE was an investment in the future of the BCA and the future of the game. Investments sometimes take time and don't immediately produce returns. But you stick with them and forego short-term benefits - and even accept some losses - because the long-term plan is so well thought-out.

But instead of sticking with it and finding ways to make it work, the BCA board did what it does best. It changed directions. For years the BCA board has been notorious for voting to follow a certain path, and then changing that path within the year. It has always lacked commitment.

The BCA will tell you that BSE is still alive, being operated out of the three-person BCA office as a part-time project for one employee. That, my friends, is a self-fulfilling prophecy. Today's BCA board has little interest in programs that don't provide revenue today.

And in BSE's place? Surely the BCA has come up with an alternate revenue-generating plan that can help drive the entire industry, as its mission calls for.

Nope. It's trade show or bust. Ironically, the one opportunity the BCA has to grow its trade show - both in attendance and exhibitors - is through growth in the billiard room category.

And don't confuse this rant with bitterness because of my involvement in BSE. If the BCA offered another truly strategic revenue-generating idea that served the entire industry, I would stand behind it every bit as passionately as I do BankShot, even if it took several years to break even.

But it hasn't, and has no plans to. The carefully played reduction in board size only increases the likelihood that the BCA's future will be driven by personal agendas. And, as it stands, those agendas are expo-centric.

Of course, the BCA will insist it can't afford new programs and needs to preserve its reserves.

Me? I'd rather gamble and fail on growing the industry than dying a slow death. To me, that's nothing less than the BCA's obligation.