HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
From the Publisher
By Mike Panozzo
Mike became editor of Billiards Digest in 1980 and liked it so much that he bought the company. He has served on the Billiard Congress of America board of directors and as president of the Billiard & Bowling Institute of America.


Archives
• April 2024
• March 2024
• February 2024
• January 2024
• December 2023
• November 2023
• October 2023
• September 2023
• August 2023
• July 2023
• June 2023
• May 2023
• April 2023
• March 2023
• February 2023
• January 2023
• December 2022
• November 2022
• October 2022
• September 2022
• August 2022
• July 2022
• June 2022
• May 2022
• April 2022
• March 2022
• February 2022
• January 2022
• December 2021
• November 2021
• October 2021
• September 2021
• August 2021
• July 2021
• June 2021
• May 2021
• April 2021
• March 2021
• February 2021
• January 2021
• December 2020
• November 2020
• October 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• July 2020
• June 2020
• May 2020
• April 2020
• March 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• December 2019
• November 2019
• October 2019
• September 2019
• August 2019
• July 2019
• June 2019
• May 2019
• April 2019
• March 2019
• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• August 2018
• July 2018
• June 2018
• May 2018
• April 2018
• March 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• November 2017
• October 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• Dec 2015
• Nov 2015
• Oct 2015
• Sept 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• May 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
 
May: Flawed But Perfect
May 2016

Sure, barry Behrman was flawed.

But his flaws were, as one American writer once put it, stitched together with good intentions."

Behrman died April 23 after a two-month battle with a bacterial infection. He had just turned 70. Behrman was, of course, the colorful and often controversial founder and promoter of the U.S. Open 9-Ball Championships, the longest-running continuous major professional pool tournament perhaps in the world. The history of Behrman's U.S. Open is a virtual timeline of professional pool over the past 40 years. He started the tournament in 1976, and as the tournament's reputation grew, so did the size and quality of its fields. U.S. Open titles are usually at the top of resumes for Hall of Fame candidates. It is no coincidence that the list of U.S. Open champions reads like the roster of the BCA Hall of Fame.

I've written before about the importance of the U.S. Open in American pool, and it is important largely because of the historical timeline that the event offers. This single event has seen winners like Sigel and Mizerak and Hopkins and Louie Roberts. It has ushered in legends like Strickland and Archer, and, more recently, Appleton, Immonen and Van Boening. It has been the career-defining moment for players like Tommy Kennedy and Gabe Owen. You can chart the game's generational changes over the past 40 years with the U.S. Open. Still, while the U.S. Open boasted a flawless reputation for the first 25 years, the 2000s have been freckled with prize money shortfalls, last-minute payout changes and even a stint in jail for the event's promoter.

I remember interviewing Barry after he reduced the prize funds during the tournament in 2001 and 2002. His event had been affected by the attacks of 9/11 in 2001, then by a hurricane in 2002. He tried to justify the reductions, despite the fact that he advertised the added money as guaranteed." I argued with him for hours, in vain, trying to explain the definition of the word guaranteed." It was not our first disagreement, and would not be our last. Two years later, Behrman spent eight months in jail following convictions for illegal gambling (Behrman hosted high-stakes gambling events at his home) and failure to pay back taxes on one of his poolrooms.

There were years in which some players boycotted the event. Others threatened to do so but never did. Foreign competitors have sometimes viewed the event with skepticism.

Despite criticism and threats from players, Behrman persevered. To his credit, Barry always admitted his mistakes, took his beatings like a man, and vowed to change. While players occasionally were forced to wait several months to get paid their winnings, Behrman always eventually paid off.

And the players kept coming back.

Why?

In part because Barry kept coming back. Players knew he didn't need to continue to produce the Open. It wasn't his primary source of income. If anything, it was a drain, financially and certainly emotionally. Undaunted, Behrman would call players during the year, explaining his next great idea to improve the event and alleviating concerns about prize fund shortfalls. He always promised that the next event would be the best ever. And you know what? He genuinely believed it.

Behrman's main flaw may well be that he wanted the U.S. Open to be the best event in the world. He always promised more prize money than he really needed to. He always stretched the limits of what his event could possibly produce revenue-wise. Any hiccup in ticket sales or sponsorships could turn his event sideways...and often did. I used to beg him to keep his guaranteed added money at $50,000, noting that if the event exceeded his expectations he could always add to the prize fund. No player, I would rationalize, ever complained about a promoter adding money after the tournament started. But Barry was always three sentences ahead in the conversation. I'm not sure he ever even heard any of my suggestions.

He could be as frustrating and confounding as any man I've ever met, and I wouldn't have wanted him to change one iota.

That's the thing about flaws. To an extent, they make us who we are. If we all got rid of all of our flaws, we would all be a lot less interesting. Barry's death seemed a particularly cruel twist of fate. On the heels of the successful 40th U.S. Open last October, he announced his intention to step away as promoter of the tournament and turn over production and promotion to Accu-Stats Video Productions President Pat Fleming. He also expressed interest in selling Q-Master Billiards, his 72-table room in Virginia Beach, Va.

Only because I am turning 70 in April," he said, along with some minor health issues as of late, it's time, after 44 years of being in business, to completely retire and sell this huge part of my life's work."

As for the Open, Behrman said, It was the best U.S. Open Championship ever. And I always wanted to go out on a high note."

RIP, Barry.

MORE VIDEO...