HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
From the Publisher
By Mike Panozzo
Mike became editor of Billiards Digest in 1980 and liked it so much that he bought the company. He has served on the Billiard Congress of America board of directors and as president of the Billiard & Bowling Institute of America.


Archives
• April 2024
• March 2024
• February 2024
• January 2024
• December 2023
• November 2023
• October 2023
• September 2023
• August 2023
• July 2023
• June 2023
• May 2023
• April 2023
• March 2023
• February 2023
• January 2023
• December 2022
• November 2022
• October 2022
• September 2022
• August 2022
• July 2022
• June 2022
• May 2022
• April 2022
• March 2022
• February 2022
• January 2022
• December 2021
• November 2021
• October 2021
• September 2021
• August 2021
• July 2021
• June 2021
• May 2021
• April 2021
• March 2021
• February 2021
• January 2021
• December 2020
• November 2020
• October 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• July 2020
• June 2020
• May 2020
• April 2020
• March 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• December 2019
• November 2019
• October 2019
• September 2019
• August 2019
• July 2019
• June 2019
• May 2019
• April 2019
• March 2019
• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• August 2018
• July 2018
• June 2018
• May 2018
• April 2018
• March 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• November 2017
• October 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• May 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• Dec 2015
• Nov 2015
• Oct 2015
• Sept 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• May 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
 
April: The Flip Side
April 2017

There is a lot to like about social media.

In the past, I’ve written about how social media has helped me in producing this magazine. Virtually everyone associated with the sport — players, manufacturers, writers, photographers, promoters, instructors, etc. — is connected to one or more social media platforms. Availability and responsiveness certainly makes my job easier and allows me to get information and feedback right up to the point of the magazine making its way to the printer. That kind of immediacy and timeliness is incredibly valuable. (Particularly so to a serial procrastinator like me!)

Obviously, social media also serves as a valuable, if not always dependable, news source. Where we used to have to go look for news, now it finds us. Just think of how many news stories have been shared as they were happening solely because of social media.

On the other hand, social media, because of its tendency to be a clearing house for unfiltered thought and opinion, can be every bit as destructive as it is beneficial. The same platforms — Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, even Website discussion forums — that allow people to share information, to develop a voice, to become activists, and/or to simply say hello, are all too often used to disparage others, tear down ideas and generally spew vitriol.

There’s a lot of the latter happening in pool’s corner of social media. And those who engage in that kind of commentary clearly don’t realize how much damage they are doing to the sport. Billiard discussion forums have long been veritable wastelands of mean-spirited, uninformed and pointless drivel. Oh, sure, there is plenty of healthy discussion on a variety of topics, but even a thread that starts as something as simple as a congratulatory remark seems to eventually find its way to knocking and name-calling. Facebook is generally less offensive, in part because of the transparency involved in posting comments. But even the “social network” can be surprisingly nasty.

Top pro Mike Dechaine recently announced (not surprisingly, on a billiard discussion forum) that he was stepping away from the sport, possibly for good. Over the years, Dechaine has been a lightening rod for controversy. As a result, he has been the subject of continual ridicule on social media. In his announcement, Dehaine admitted that “being a topic of discussion has made me crack.” No one will argue that many of Dechaine’s wounds have been self-inflicted, but the fact that constant beatings on social media could impact someone’s decision to leave the sport is disheartening, to say the least. The even bigger picture that few seem to see is the impact on the game’s future that is affected by the constant tearing down of our own sport and the people who are involved in the game.

If anyone wonders why companies outside traditional billiard circles don’t seem to want to associate themselves with pool, let me give you an idea of just one reason. I guarantee that when a corporation or marketing agency begins its research into the value of a sport or activity or cause, it spends much of its early research time monitoring that potential partner on social media. That is fact.

Now, say you’re a marketing agency representing a potential sponsor. Your client’s name will be tied to and associated with pool. So you look online — on Facebook and on billiard Websites — and all you see are people bashing the sport, bashing the players, bashing tournament formats, bashing equipment… Starting to get the picture? That marketing firm is derelict in its duties if it doesn’t go back to the client and advise them to “stay as far away from this sport as you can!” In some ways, social media has supplanted “smoke-filled poolrooms and gambling” as the sport’s biggest deterrent to outside sponsorship. I know for a fact that the scenario described above has impacted sponsorship in another sport similar to billiards. That’s not to say that every post on the sport should be seashells and balloons. Spirited discussion is always a good thing.

I just hope the next time some oh-so-smart, oh-so-clever person who considers himself or herself part of the billiard community prepares to rip a player or a promoter on social media, he or she gives at least a moment’s thought about the bigger picture.

MORE VIDEO...