HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
From the Publisher
By Mike Panozzo
Mike became editor of Billiards Digest in 1980 and liked it so much that he bought the company. He has served on the Billiard Congress of America board of directors and as president of the Billiard & Bowling Institute of America.


Archives
• April 2024
• March 2024
• February 2024
• January 2024
• December 2023
• November 2023
• October 2023
• September 2023
• August 2023
• July 2023
• June 2023
• May 2023
• April 2023
• March 2023
• February 2023
• January 2023
• December 2022
• November 2022
• October 2022
• September 2022
• August 2022
• July 2022
• June 2022
• May 2022
• April 2022
• March 2022
• February 2022
• January 2022
• December 2021
• November 2021
• October 2021
• September 2021
• August 2021
• July 2021
• June 2021
• May 2021
• April 2021
• March 2021
• February 2021
• January 2021
• December 2020
• November 2020
• October 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• July 2020
• June 2020
• May 2020
• April 2020
• March 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• December 2019
• November 2019
• October 2019
• September 2019
• August 2019
• July 2019
• May 2019
• April 2019
• March 2019
• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• August 2018
• July 2018
• June 2018
• May 2018
• April 2018
• March 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• November 2017
• October 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• May 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• Dec 2015
• Nov 2015
• Oct 2015
• Sept 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• May 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
 
June: “Can’t Be Done!”
June 2019

Performing under pressure, particularly amid lofty expectations, is something few do well. Some people, however, seem to thrive on it. The more pressure, the more daunting the challenge, the more focused and relentless the pursuit of success.

The recent U.S. Open 9-Ball Championship produced such pressure, which was palpable even before the first ball was struck at the Mandalay Bay Convention Center in late April. The U.S. Open has been the premier professional tournament in the United States for more than 40 years. It is a career-defining title for its champions.

But in this case the pressure of which I speak was not on the players, although nearly every one of the 256 players that traveled to Las Vegas from around the globe felt the pressure that comes with dreaming of winning the event.

No, in this instance the pressure was on Matchroom Multi Sport to live up to its promise to take the venerable tournament to “the next level” in 2019.

As pool fans have learned over the years, Matchroom prides itself on producing the sport’s best events. Promotion and staging are every bit as important at Matchroom as players and prize money. Prior to its acquisition of the U.S. Open 9-Ball Championship, however, Matchroom had spent more than a dozen years producing only smaller invitational events staged in one-table venues: the Mosconi Cup, the World Cup of Pool and the World Pool Masters. (Matchroom did run the World Pool Championship from the late ’90s through the early 2000s.) The U.S. Open, was a significant step up in weight class.

Not that Matchroom shied away from the challenge. On the contrary. It spent more than a year hyping the event, preparing players and fans for a tournament unlike any other.

With the expectations came questions. And with the questions came concerns. List me among the group of tournament watchdogs that worried for the event’s success. There were discussions concerning the event’s timeframe. Word made its way around the industry that Matchroom had less than 24 hours to stage the 40,000-square-foot arena that would be used for the first three days of qualification rounds. That’s one day to place 34 tables, hang lighting, set up a control station and place signage and seating.

“Can’t be done,” was the common response from people that have installed tables and produced tournaments.

Know what? It got done. It took Multi Sport COO Emily Frazer and her crew 22 straight hours of work to make it happen (including some fancy footwork when a crate containing streaming equipment, set furniture and all of the ball sets failed to show up), but the job got done. By the time the players arrived for the first round of play, the arena that greeted them was organized and stylish.

But, certainly the idea of trimming the field from 256 to 16 in three days was ridiculous.

“Can’t be done,” the naysayers repeated.

Not only did the scheduling go off without a hitch, but it was done without a single match testing midnight. In fact, the final 16 was set by 7 p.m. on the third day.

And when the event moved to the nearly 700-seat, single-table television arena, any concerns disappeared. This was Matchroom’s wheelhouse. The finals arena was dramatic and exciting, and you could sense that the players were feeding off the atmosphere. The matches were thrilling and the drama made for compelling TV.

“I never faulted people for being worried,” Frazer said, following the event. “The more I heard it the more I was driven to show we could do it.”

In the end, Matchroom delivered exactly what it said it would. And for all of the discussion over added money, entry fees and prize fund, it was obvious that many people (myself included) may have been missing the point. Matchroom’s priority was to create an open championship the likes of which had not previously been produced in the U.S., to create a look and feel and atmosphere that would generate a buzz, attract a live crowd, draw solid TV viewership and, in the end, present an event that potential corporate sponsors would pay to be part of.

Matchroom did its part. The event was spectacular.

Perhaps the only sour note for me was the response of pool’s fan base. The first three days of the tournament were streamed on Facebook Live for free. The production level was outstanding and viewership numbers were strong. But when the event switched to subscription sports streamer DAZN in the U.S. ($19.95/month) for the final three days, the obligatory moaning from the sport’s penny-pinching fans filtered through social media.

What’s worse, the DAZN feed was hijacked and shared on Facebook The pirated feed generated some 80,000 views. (Several pro players even shared it!)

It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that pool’s own “fans” are jeopardizing the event’s chances of landing corporate sponsorship, which would, of course, increase the prize money for the players and help build the U.S. Open (and other tournaments) into a major sporting event.

Apparently, that doesn’t worry Matchroom.

“We are planning something even bigger for next year,” announced Matchroom Chairman Barry Hearn.

What? Can’t be done!

MORE VIDEO...