HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
From the Publisher
By Mike Panozzo
Mike became editor of Billiards Digest in 1980 and liked it so much that he bought the company. He has served on the Billiard Congress of America board of directors and as president of the Billiard & Bowling Institute of America.


Archives
• March 2024
• February 2024
• January 2024
• December 2023
• November 2023
• October 2023
• September 2023
• August 2023
• July 2023
• June 2023
• May 2023
• April 2023
• March 2023
• February 2023
• January 2023
• December 2022
• November 2022
• October 2022
• September 2022
• August 2022
• July 2022
• June 2022
• May 2022
• April 2022
• March 2022
• February 2022
• January 2022
• December 2021
• November 2021
• October 2021
• September 2021
• August 2021
• July 2021
• June 2021
• May 2021
• April 2021
• March 2021
• February 2021
• January 2021
• December 2020
• November 2020
• October 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• July 2020
• June 2020
• May 2020
• April 2020
• March 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• December 2019
• November 2019
• October 2019
• September 2019
• August 2019
• July 2019
• June 2019
• May 2019
• April 2019
• March 2019
• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• August 2018
• July 2018
• June 2018
• May 2018
• April 2018
• March 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• November 2017
• October 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• May 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• Dec 2015
• Nov 2015
• Oct 2015
• Sept 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• May 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
 
May: The Bigger Picture
May 2015

At first blush, the recently announced Atlantic Challenge Cup probably looks like a nice little transatlantic tournament between young players from the United States and Europe; a "friendly," of sorts, to give youngsters an opportunity to compete in an international event.

The Billiard Congress of America (BCA) and the European Pocket Billiard Federation (EPBF) collaborated on the idea of a junior tournament that would mimic the highly successful Mosconi Cup. The inaugural Atlantic Challenge Cup will take place in Rankweil, Austria, in July, with the event then alternating every year between a site in the U.S. and a site in Europe.

The Challenge Cup will feature four boys and two girls under the age of 20, competing in a variety of matchessingles, doubles, team, etc. Obviously, the primary selling point during the tournament will be national pride, but the value of the Challenge Cup goes far beyond the final match count.

Cliche as it sounds, the future of any sport is in the development of youth participants. Golf, soccer, tennis and even bowling have recognized the importance of young participants, as well as the challenges in capturing - and holding - the attention of today's youth. And each sport has poured valuable resources into youth programs.

Naturally, youth programs aren't cheap to launch. The development process - which usually requires elaborate youth initiatives, clinics, tournaments, etc. - takes plenty of time and money. And the return can take years.

Anyone even remotely connected to the competitive billiard world knows that the billiard industry in the U.S. doesn't possess the war chest that many of the bigger sports do. Many foreign countries - including some of the member countries of the EPBF - have government-funded youth programs, but even those budgets are relatively small. Asia, on the other hand, has plenty of funding and opportunity for its young players. The results are evident in Asia's dominance at all levels in recent years.

No, if pool in the U.S. is going to rebuild through a youth movement, it is going to have to do so on a shoestring budget. Which brings me back to the Atlantic Challenge Cup and its big-picture importance to the pool world.

I have stated before that I love the concept of a true Team USA, funded by the industry. The need for development of players for international play, beyond the annual Mosconi Cup, is becoming more evident with every international event. World-beater Shane Van Boening aside, players from the U.S. rarely finish in the top 10 any longer. And the dearth of a professional tour in the U.S. has made the international events even more meaningful.

Wouldn't it be nice to have a yearlong Team USA program? I'm not advocating millions of dollars to fund coaches, players, facilities, training and all. I'm talking about a half-dozen players being paid a small stipend, assembling five or six times a year for structured training, and having their tabs footed to attend the biggest international tournaments. It's all about developing something that others might aspire to.

That's also where the Junior Team USA idea becomes equally important. The juniors will now have something to aspire to as well.

For a model that works, look no further than what Team USA captain Mark Wilson has done at Lindenwood University near St. Louis. Kids aspire to that program. They can play pool and gain an education.

Clearly, the BCA doesn't have the wherewithal to drive a national youth program. But setting up a structured system as small as Team USA can have a tremendous trickle-down effect. If pro players aspire to Team USA, doesn't that trickle down to the youth? If youth players aspire to Junior Team USA, don't more youngsters want to become better players? It's all about opportunities. If the industry can generate meaningful opportunies, players have something to play for.

All of a sudden, players will be looking for those opportunites. That brings America's long-forgotten billiard rooms back into the picture. Qualifiers for youth tournaments could become meaningful again. And kids who want to win those tournaments will be looking for ways to improve their game. Doesn't that bring instruction and coaching back into play? Players used to aspire to the Pro Billiards Tour and the Women's Professional Billiard Association Classic Tour. With pro tours in the U.S. all but extinct, where are the opportunities? What is there to play for?

Since the industry doesn't have the money to truly develop from the bottom up, what about a top-down approach?

I'd love to see Junior Team USA become something that players would give their eye teeth to be part of. And I'd like to see it be more than a one-tournament-a-year program. The selection process alone could involve team trials and qualification events. A little out there? Sure, but no one will argue that pool needs to develop players. And without a big budget, it's time we got creative.

MORE VIDEO...