HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
From the Publisher
By Mike Panozzo
Mike became editor of Billiards Digest in 1980 and liked it so much that he bought the company. He has served on the Billiard Congress of America board of directors and as president of the Billiard & Bowling Institute of America.


Archives
• March 2024
• February 2024
• January 2024
• December 2023
• November 2023
• October 2023
• September 2023
• August 2023
• July 2023
• June 2023
• May 2023
• April 2023
• March 2023
• February 2023
• January 2023
• December 2022
• November 2022
• October 2022
• September 2022
• August 2022
• July 2022
• June 2022
• May 2022
• April 2022
• March 2022
• February 2022
• January 2022
• December 2021
• November 2021
• October 2021
• September 2021
• August 2021
• July 2021
• June 2021
• May 2021
• April 2021
• March 2021
• February 2021
• January 2021
• December 2020
• November 2020
• October 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• July 2020
• June 2020
• May 2020
• April 2020
• March 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• December 2019
• November 2019
• October 2019
• September 2019
• August 2019
• July 2019
• June 2019
• May 2019
• April 2019
• March 2019
• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• August 2018
• July 2018
• June 2018
• May 2018
• April 2018
• March 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• November 2017
• October 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• May 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• Dec 2015
• Nov 2015
• Oct 2015
• Sept 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• May 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
 
April: What Happens in Alpine
April 2010
LET'S START off with a disclaimer: I have never met John Rousseau. We communicated through e-mail last year when I was helping with preparations for the Billiard Congress of America Hall of Fame Banquet, at which one of Mr. Rousseau's close friends, Allison Fisher, was being honored. We have also spoken several times on the phone. All correspondence has been pleasant.

Why the disclaimer?

Because Rousseau, who is currently the president of the Women's Professional Billiard Association, has found himself at the center of an emotionally charged and dreadfully timed controversy surrounding the WPBA board of directors.

Rousseau, a respected and successful executive in the receivable management, debt collection and debt-buying/selling business, was elected to the WPBA board of directors back in November 2009. He's been a staunch supporter of the WPBA Classic Tour and its players for a number of years, holding particularly close his friendships with Allison Fisher and Jeanette Lee. Rousseau was part of a board overhaul that saw five new directors elected, including a lawyer (Mimi McAndrews), a sales and marketing executive (Tamre Rogers) and a software engineer (Tim DiMacchia). Through a series of resignations, including that of then-president Dawn Hopkins, the board shrank to four (Rousseau, Rogers, McAndrews and Belinda Calhoun), and Rousseau was elected WPBA president in January 2010.

Soon thereafter came whispers that the election was improper, although various interpretations of the process seem to prove very little. Then came allegations of a budding dictatorship.

Then came a contentious players meeting at the 2010 Classic Tour opener in Alpine, Calif. The meeting allegedly included accusations of board improprieties and a backhanded slam at a longtime tour sponsor. Details from the meeting were leaked to the press and soon found their way into cyberspace.

To me, it's all very un-WPBA-ish!

One of the WPBA's greatest attributes over the years has been its ability to deal with its problems internally. Heck, in the past I practically had to dress in drag and hang out in the practice room to find out even the most inconsequential details about board decisions. In the past few weeks I've had to put WPBA players and insiders on hold to tell other players and insiders I'd call them back!

Something is wrong here.

I've spoken with numerous people who were at the now-famous players meeting, and with numerous people who were not but are close to the situation. What I've come away with at this juncture is this: rules and protocol haven't been followed, and Mr. Rousseau may not be the most diplomatic leader in WPBA history.

And at this point I'm thinking, "Really? This is what has turned the WPBA upside down? Really?"

Am I the only one who's noticed that the WPBA Classic Tour is hanging by a thread these days? Am I the only one who's noticed that the WPBA is having a somewhat difficult time (tongue firmly planted in cheek) landing sponsors and tournament sites?

Is Rousseau, or the new board for that matter, the cause of those problems? I don't think so. Numerous changes over the past few years (the economy and several less-than-shrewd decisions by previous WPBA boards) have put the Classic Tour in its current position which is a "tour" in the loosest sense of the word - a grand total of two events slated for 2010.

Is this board the answer? Don't know. Hopefully we won't have to wait six months or so discussing protocol and board seats before we find out.

Here's the deal, ladies. You need to play the hand you've been dealt. You elected these people. Let the board decide who does what. And remember, these people are volunteers! Who wants to volunteer their time and business expertise to a group that's going to snipe at every decision? If Rousseau isn't the person you want negotiating your sponsorship deals, convince the board to assign the task to someone else.

Then move on, because as I see it, WPBA, you should focus all of your energy from this point forward on one thing: Your hours on ESPN. Why? When you get down to it, your ESPN contract is all that separates you from the mire that has become the men's pro tour.

You just signed a new three-year deal with ESPN, right? How many hours a year are you on the hook for? Twenty-four? Twenty-five? And how many hours did you tape in San Diego? Three.

Now, I'm no math major, but my calculations indicate that you have one more event scheduled for 2010, and more than 20 hours of obligation to the World Wide Leader. What are you planning on doing, taping practice sessions at the U.S. Open in July?

The WPBA is in existence because of its contract with ESPN. It has succeeded where many sports (including men's pool) have failed because of its ESPN contract. Lose that contract because you can't fill the hours and I can absolutely guarantee you that you will never see another ESPN contract.

Ladies (and Mr. Rousseau), put the "Avalanche in Alpine" behind you as quickly as possible and start working on the one thing that should be driving you for the remainder of this year

Survival.

MORE VIDEO...