HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
From the Publisher
By Mike Panozzo
Mike became editor of Billiards Digest in 1980 and liked it so much that he bought the company. He has served on the Billiard Congress of America board of directors and as president of the Billiard & Bowling Institute of America.


Archives
• October 2024
• September 2024
• August 2024
• July 2024
• June 2024
• May 2024
• April 2024
• March 2024
• February 2024
• January 2024
• December 2023
• November 2023
• October 2023
• September 2023
• August 2023
• July 2023
• June 2023
• May 2023
• April 2023
• March 2023
• February 2023
• January 2023
• December 2022
• November 2022
• October 2022
• September 2022
• August 2022
• July 2022
• June 2022
• May 2022
• April 2022
• March 2022
• February 2022
• January 2022
• December 2021
• November 2021
• October 2021
• September 2021
• August 2021
• July 2021
• June 2021
• May 2021
• April 2021
• March 2021
• February 2021
• January 2021
• December 2020
• November 2020
• October 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• July 2020
• June 2020
• May 2020
• April 2020
• March 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• December 2019
• November 2019
• October 2019
• September 2019
• August 2019
• July 2019
• June 2019
• May 2019
• April 2019
• March 2019
• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• August 2018
• July 2018
• June 2018
• May 2018
• April 2018
• March 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• November 2017
• October 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• May 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• Dec 2015
• Nov 2015
• Sept 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• May 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
 
October: What’s in a Title?
Oct 2015

This is a story about titles.

A local publisher had a writing contest. The publisher called it "The World Writing Championships". Entries came in from around the state and a few from other states in the U.S. I think they even got an entry from Sweden or Norway; one of those Scandanavian countries. I happened to win the title. I now have a plaque declaring me "2015 World Writing Champion". I'm very proud of this. (Of course this is fictional! You had to ask? But you see where I'm going with this, right?)

Outside of perhaps boxing, no other sport obsesses with the word "world" more than pool. It's been going on for years and years. When I started covering the sport in the early '80s, promoters added "World" to their tournament titles about as freely as they added the term "based on entries" to their payout lists. What were essentially regional events with $4,000 top prizes were routinely dubbed "World All-Around" or "World 9-Ball". The result, of course, was that every player's resume was freckled with world titles. Match introductions often pitted "seven-time world champion" against "nine-time world champion". And neither player would be 30 years old! I always attributed the trend to the sport's general insecurities. If you don't get much press coverage, telling a reporter (or potential sponsor) that your claim to fame is the Toledo Open championship doesn't have much umph. Thankfully, when the men and women pros had established tours in the 1990s and the World Pool-Billiard Association (WPA) was formed, the trend faded somewhat. There was one World 9-Ball Champion every year, and no one argued that point.

The confusion has resurfaced recently with the World Tournament of 14.1, a straight pool event held in New York City each year since 2006. The tournament was the brainchild of player/promoter Charlie Williams. Williams' motives are noble. Straight pool is a great game, and the event allowed fans of the game - both players and spectators - to get together annually for a few long runs. For four out of the first five years, the event drew the imprimatur of the WPA and was sanctioned as the "World Straight Pool Championship." That stamp of approval comes with guidelines. Some of those guidelines revolve around prize money (as they should), but, more importantly, some of those guidelines dictate who gets to play in the tournament. And that's the way it should be. National federations from around the globe should be involved in sending their champions to any event for which a world title is at stake. In recent years, due to difficulty in drumming up a large enough purse, Williams lost WPA sanctioning and cleverly changed the name of the event to the World Tournament of 14.1. The tournament is open to any player around the world, but that certainly doesn't make it a world championship. The title, however, clouds that distinction. And that's no coincidence. The promoter wants it that way. Now, it may seem like we've been over this before, and this argument is old news. But this isn't a diatribe against the World Tournament of 14.1. And it's absolutely not a knock against Thorsten Hohmann, winner of the 2015 tournament. It's actually against news outlets, websites and fans that insist on trumpeting Thorsten Hohmann as the "four-time World Straight Pool Champion". In truth, only once (2006) was Hohmann's win in New York a sanctioned world championship. It may seem trivial, but if you had a chance to follow the recent World 9-Ball Championship from Qatar, the difference crystalizes. The 9-ball event in Qatar may have only paid $30,000 to the winner (long gone are the days of $70,000 and more to the champion), but the structure of the tournament had the legitimacy that a world championship deserves. The very top players from every nation competed. Players who weren't invited battled in a killer qualifying tournament for the few open spots.

By contrast, the field at the World Tournament of 14.1 was filled in part by doctors, lawyers and laymen who just happened to like the game and had the wherewithal to post an entry fee.

Again, this is no knock against Thorsten Hohmann, a gifted and legitamate world champion (straight pool and 9-ball) who loves straight pool and may well be the best straight pool player of his generation.

But I think Hohmann would be the first to admit that the difference between the World Tournament of 14.1 and WPA World 9-Ball Championship in Qatar was well, otherworldly! It's important to the credibility of the sport to maintain these distinctions. And this is where I believe the WPA is important to our sport. Someone needs to be in control of determining what is a world championship and what is not. And followers of the sport should be aware and in support of this system.

MORE VIDEO...