HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
From the Publisher
By Mike Panozzo
Mike became editor of Billiards Digest in 1980 and liked it so much that he bought the company. He has served on the Billiard Congress of America board of directors and as president of the Billiard & Bowling Institute of America.


Archives
• April 2024
• March 2024
• February 2024
• January 2024
• December 2023
• November 2023
• October 2023
• September 2023
• August 2023
• July 2023
• June 2023
• May 2023
• April 2023
• March 2023
• February 2023
• January 2023
• December 2022
• November 2022
• October 2022
• September 2022
• August 2022
• July 2022
• June 2022
• May 2022
• April 2022
• March 2022
• February 2022
• January 2022
• December 2021
• November 2021
• October 2021
• September 2021
• August 2021
• July 2021
• June 2021
• May 2021
• April 2021
• March 2021
• February 2021
• January 2021
• December 2020
• November 2020
• October 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• July 2020
• June 2020
• May 2020
• April 2020
• March 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• December 2019
• November 2019
• October 2019
• September 2019
• August 2019
• July 2019
• June 2019
• May 2019
• April 2019
• March 2019
• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• August 2018
• July 2018
• June 2018
• May 2018
• April 2018
• March 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• November 2017
• October 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• May 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• Dec 2015
• Nov 2015
• Oct 2015
• Sept 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• May 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
 
September: What’s The Good Word?
September 2017

Contrary to the perception many have about this pulpit of a page I preach from on a monthly basis, this space is not exclusively reserved for lamenting the ills of the billiard industry and the competitive side of the game. It just seems that way. What people fail to understand is that the value of editorial commentary is that it is bound by no rules and obligated to no particular “side.” And because of that, most editorial commentaries are most valuable when they point out what others either fail to see or choose not to see. And, more often than not, what get pointed out are warts.

That’s just the nature of the beast. In truth, it’s not fun constantly drawing attention to things that are wrong or things that need to be fixed. But if exposing the industry’s problems — and suggesting remedies — gets people to think and discuss, the process is a success.

Anyone who has read this column over the years has come to recognize that there are few areas of real leadership, so the victims of the pointy end of the pen tend to be recurring names.

One recurring role in this ongoing drama is the Billiard Congress of America. Really, that shouldn’t be surprising, given that in the United States the BCA is pretty much the federal government. And if you’ve read national newspapers or listened to national news, the federal government in the U.S. is a daily source of commentary. Not surprisingly, most of that commentary is critical of government officials and policy.

The BCA catches a lot of grief in large part because so much is expected of it. Until every segment of the billiard industry is riding waves of prosperity, the association can expect criticism. Is that fair? Of course not.

But since we are all in constant search of ways to make the business and the sport better, it is simply easier (and, frankly, more productive) to focus on what can be done better.

Admittedly, that also causes many of us to lose sight of what the association does well. And the BCA does plenty well. So, at the risk of completely ruining a reputation that has taken 35 years to build, let me throw a few platitudes in the direction of Broomfield, Colo. It is very easy to remember the gravy days of the BCA, particularly the post-“Color of Money” years during which the association and its members — the manufacturers, distributors, retailers and room owners — were enjoying unprecedented success. But in the post-recession years of the late 2000s, when the size of the industry shrank to a quarter of its previous size, it was all the BCA could do to simply stay afloat. The history lesson is relevant because it puts into perspective the mountain that the trade association has had to climb in the past six years. The industry’s collective anxiety over righting the listing business has made us all a little impatient.

To its credit, the BCA first hunkered down and then embarked on what continues to be a slow, steady path to stability. Forget riches. Forget glory years. Small, measured steps are what the association preaches.

The problem with small steps is that it takes a while before they make noticeable progress. The impatient tend to not even notice. But at the recent BCA Expo in Las Vegas, the vision and benefit of some of those steps became a little clearer.

The annual trade show, of course, is the BCA’s number one value and its primary source of income. It has taken years for the industry to come to grips with its smaller self, and the expo can be a cruel reminder of just how much the industry has shrunk. But the BCA has been dogged in its quest to make the best out of what the industry is today. This year the BCA launched an “Innovative Products” program, drawing attention to the fact that the hundreds-of-years-old industry can still be creative and innovative.

Will the “Innovative Products” program turn the tide of the show or entire industry? No. But its impact on the exhibitors and attendees was noticeable, and it is a program that will grow in size and value as the years go on. The 2017 Expo also featured the Billiard Education Foundation Junior Nationals for the fourth consecutive year. At first, the Junior Nats were met with quizzical looks and a fair amount of skepticism. “What are these kids doing here? And, for God’s sake, keep them out of my booth!” were the common responses. Today, however, exhibitors welcome the aspiring, young consumer purchasers of the future! It adds an element of excitement to the show. And the BCA’s investment in youth events like the Atlantic Challenge Cup supports its desire to re-build the game from the ground up.

The next step, also introduced this year, was to include the Professional Billiard Instructors Association into the mix and introduce a new program linking instructors to the youth players. It was another small step in creating synergies that should generate activity and business for all levels of the industry.

For all of the punches they take, the BCA leadership — its volunteer board of directors and CEO Rob Johnson — can be proud of the things it has done right. Now, can we talk about the WPA?

MORE VIDEO...