HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
From the Publisher
By Mike Panozzo
Mike became editor of Billiards Digest in 1980 and liked it so much that he bought the company. He has served on the Billiard Congress of America board of directors and as president of the Billiard & Bowling Institute of America.


Archives
• March 2024
• February 2024
• January 2024
• December 2023
• November 2023
• October 2023
• September 2023
• August 2023
• July 2023
• June 2023
• May 2023
• April 2023
• March 2023
• February 2023
• January 2023
• December 2022
• November 2022
• October 2022
• September 2022
• August 2022
• July 2022
• June 2022
• May 2022
• April 2022
• March 2022
• February 2022
• January 2022
• December 2021
• November 2021
• October 2021
• September 2021
• August 2021
• July 2021
• June 2021
• May 2021
• April 2021
• March 2021
• February 2021
• January 2021
• December 2020
• November 2020
• October 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• July 2020
• June 2020
• May 2020
• April 2020
• March 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• December 2019
• November 2019
• October 2019
• September 2019
• August 2019
• July 2019
• June 2019
• May 2019
• April 2019
• March 2019
• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• August 2018
• July 2018
• June 2018
• May 2018
• April 2018
• March 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• November 2017
• October 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• May 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• Dec 2015
• Nov 2015
• Oct 2015
• Sept 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• May 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
 
May: Tournaments Done Right
May 2017

As opinionated as I can be (queue worldwide head-nodding), I don’t hold a candle to the average (and oftentimes below average) pool player. Virtually every pool player has an opinion about what is wrong with the professional side of the sport, who is to blame for its problems and how easily the entire sport can be saved. And when it comes to tournament formats and equipment? Stand back! Pockets should be tighter. Rack your own. Opponent racks. Referee racks. Magic Rack. Standard triangle. Break box. No break box. Winner breaks. Alternate breaks. Seeded players must wear Bermuda shorts. And on and on.

Not surprisingly, the task of saving the sport and fixing the formats usually falls on someone other than the person with the opinion.

Every so often, however, a player will try to make a difference himself, and that’s what Darren Appleton has done with the creation of the World Pool Series. Appleton has plenty of opinions himself, but he was smart enough to solicit the opinions of other players, promoters and industry insiders in designing the standards and formats for his series.

Simply getting the four-tournament 8-ball series off the ground was impressive enough but, two events in, the WPS has the look of a series that other promoters and hopefuls would be smart to emulate — and that includes the World Pool-Billiard Association.

There is a lot to like about the World Pool Series. Is it flawless? Of course not. There have been hiccups and changes through the first two events, but it is easy to see all the things that Appleton and his cadre of production partners are doing right.

For starters, where other promoters focus on one-off events, Appleton insisted on a series of tournaments to give some continuity to the sport. And to keep his costs and workload down, he arranged to have each event played at Manny Stamakis’ Steinway Billiards in New York. Of course, everyone would prefer the tournament be staged in a large dedicated arena, but Appleton was smart enough to walk before he ran. Get the system in place, ensure the tournaments are a success, produce results for the sponsors and build from there, he figured.

I don’t have a problem with that. As for the format, Appleton has tinkered with it. The break box has changed and the bracket format has shifted slightly. There have been small changes in the spot-shot tie-breaker format, but the pressure-enhancing addition to the matches remains one of the truly brilliant elements Appleton added to the tournaments. The changes show that he observes and listens, which certainly doesn’t mean that changes will be made every time a player has a problem with the format. But it does show a continuing effort to perfect the product. Still, there is work to do. Any format that causes top players like American Shane Van Boening to pass on the event needs to be re-evaluated. But where Appleton and the WPS really excel is in vision. There is a plan. What has always amazed me about other promoters and other events is the shortsightedness that they display. How many tournaments have you followed — or tried to follow — in which there was virtually zero attention to detail? Want to see the brackets and know what the upcoming matches are? If you’re lucky, a blurred photo of the handwritten flow chart might be posted online. Want to know the payouts after the event has ended? Good luck. Want to learn anything about the players in the event? No chance. How about photos, press releases and interviews. Seriously?

The World Pool Series took all of that into consideration before the first event even kicked off.

Streaming matches has become relatively commonplace for pool tournaments these days, but the WPS has upped the ante. After streaming the first event, Appleton was contacted by Internet media giant UNILAD. The U.K.-based company carried the stream for the second event on its Facebook page, which has some 12 million followers. According to Appleton, nearly four million people caught at least a portion of the April WPS event. The fledgling partnership spurred the WPS to purchase new cameras and editing equipment to enhance the programming. The potential for both partners is enormous.

The WPS also enlisted the best in the business to create more buzz around the events and the players. The brilliant Ted Lerner has been brought in to handle publicity, from daily press releases to in-match commentary and taped interviews with players and industry personalities. Those efforts are further enhanced by the presence of pool’s preeminent event photographer, JP Parmentier.

Put all those pieces together and the WPS has a real chance to reach well beyond traditional pool circles and create stars. This is how you begin to move the needle. Are you paying attention here, WPA?

Don’t get me wrong. The WPS isn’t the second coming of Matchroom, but it should be commended on what it has accompllished on limited resources and budget. There is a chance for real growth here. To an extent, it’s a shame that it took a world champion player to show the rest of the industry how to produce a tournament right.

Of course, this is all just my opinion.

MORE VIDEO...