HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
From the Publisher
By Mike Panozzo
Mike became editor of Billiards Digest in 1980 and liked it so much that he bought the company. He has served on the Billiard Congress of America board of directors and as president of the Billiard & Bowling Institute of America.


Archives
• August 2025
• July 2025
• June 2025
• May 2025
• April 2025
• March 2025
• February 2025
• January 2025
• December 2024
• November 2024
• October 2024
• September 2024
• August 2024
• July 2024
• June 2024
• May 2024
• April 2024
• March 2024
• February 2024
• January 2024
• December 2023
• November 2023
• October 2023
• September 2023
• August 2023
• July 2023
• June 2023
• May 2023
• April 2023
• March 2023
• February 2023
• January 2023
• December 2022
• November 2022
• October 2022
• September 2022
• August 2022
• July 2022
• June 2022
• May 2022
• April 2022
• March 2022
• February 2022
• January 2022
• December 2021
• November 2021
• October 2021
• September 2021
• August 2021
• July 2021
• June 2021
• May 2021
• April 2021
• March 2021
• February 2021
• January 2021
• December 2020
• November 2020
• October 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• July 2020
• June 2020
• May 2020
• April 2020
• March 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• December 2019
• November 2019
• October 2019
• September 2019
• August 2019
• July 2019
• June 2019
• May 2019
• April 2019
• March 2019
• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• August 2018
• July 2018
• June 2018
• May 2018
• April 2018
• March 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• November 2017
• October 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• May 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• Dec 2015
• Nov 2015
• Oct 2015
• Sept 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• May 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
 
September: Comparing Eras
September 2025

A question was posed to me recently by my friends at 77.billiards, an entertaining and informative pool site with more than 70K followers: Would you say this has been the most exciting era of pool you’ve covered? If not, which era do you think was?

It’s a great question and it had me looking closely at the different eras I’ve been fortunate enough to witness. Which was most exciting?

For starters, while questions like this regarding any sport are great for barstool conversations, there is of course no definitive answer. The debates are largely subjective. Still, excitement is easier to compare than greatness, and pool has certainly had its share of relatively listless periods, so picking the ones I found/find most exciting is actually pretty easy.

History tends to give names to eras, like the Paleozoic Era or the Renaissance. Let’s just call my two most exciting eras in pool the “Golden Era” and the “Modern Era.” My Golden Era was from the mid-1980s to the mid-’90s, give or take a few years on each end. My Modern Era encompasses the past decade (and, hopefully, beyond).

Pool’s Golden Era was exciting for its personality and style. It was the greatest era of pool in the United States in terms of player depth and tournament opportunities. The game was still predominantly American, and the talent through that era will likely never be matched. To go to tournaments and see the flow chart freckled with names like Sigel and Varner and Mizerak and Hall and Reyes and Parica and Hopkins and Rempe and Strickland and Martin and Davenport, as well as the David Howards, the Keith McCreadys, the Louis Roberts, and Reed Pierces and Mike LeBrons was astonishing. Don’t kid yourself. These were the names and the games the spawned the growth of competitive pool internationally, particularly throughout Europe. By the early ’90s, players from Europe and Asia, led by the Filipino invasion that Parica and Reyes helped create, were starting to become tournament fixtures, changing the game forever.

And talent aside, the players from the Golden Era were some of the most colorful characters the game ever produced. Gambling matches often took place on practice tables in the hotel hallways which usually produced hysterically funny banter and barking, oftentimes drawing more spectators than the tournament itself.

The only place more crowded than the tournament room was usually the hotel bar at the end of the night’s play, and the stories that were traded could fill a writer’s notebook many times over. This was not a crowd that was monitoring its sleep or counting calories. The hotel fitness rooms back then routinely needed to be dusted for lack of use.

Another thing that made that era exciting was that many of the bigger tournaments of the day included a women’s pro event as well, and getting to see Jean Balukas, Ewa, Loree Jon, Belinda, Robin, Mary Kenniston and others compete side-by-side with the men was a treat. I miss those days. I guarantee today’s fans who’ve attended recent events that feature both men and women pros know exactly what I’m talking about.

But the Golden Era was short on television exposure, and was pre-internet technology, which is a shame. It was ripe for a marketing visionary. It could have been big.

Which brings us to the Modern Era. And the Modern Era has me very excited.

There is little doubt that the level of talent in pro pool today is far deeper than it has ever been. (Does that mean it’s better? Discussion for a different day!) The number of countries represented these days is astounding. The support they receive, either monetary or emotional, is amazing. The growth in emerging markets is encouraging.

And, while tournaments during the Golden Era were predominantly put on by individual promoters, the promoters driving the big events today are truly professional. The game is being treated and presented like a professional sport more than it ever has.

Because of those factors, the game in the Modern Era is the most competitive, the most visible, the most organized and the most marketable it has ever been. Ever.

The potential is limitless. It is as pure a global sport as any, which marketers should be salivating over.

My favorite era? If excitement is based on adrenaline, I’ll go with the Golden Era. If excitement is based on promise, I’ll go with the Modern Era.

MORE VIDEO...