HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
From the Publisher
By Mike Panozzo
Mike became editor of Billiards Digest in 1980 and liked it so much that he bought the company. He has served on the Billiard Congress of America board of directors and as president of the Billiard & Bowling Institute of America.


Archives
• September 2025
• August 2025
• July 2025
• June 2025
• May 2025
• April 2025
• March 2025
• February 2025
• January 2025
• December 2024
• November 2024
• October 2024
• September 2024
• August 2024
• July 2024
• June 2024
• May 2024
• April 2024
• March 2024
• February 2024
• January 2024
• December 2023
• November 2023
• October 2023
• September 2023
• August 2023
• July 2023
• June 2023
• May 2023
• April 2023
• March 2023
• February 2023
• January 2023
• December 2022
• November 2022
• October 2022
• September 2022
• August 2022
• July 2022
• June 2022
• May 2022
• April 2022
• March 2022
• February 2022
• January 2022
• December 2021
• November 2021
• October 2021
• September 2021
• August 2021
• July 2021
• June 2021
• May 2021
• April 2021
• March 2021
• February 2021
• January 2021
• December 2020
• November 2020
• October 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• July 2020
• June 2020
• May 2020
• April 2020
• March 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• December 2019
• November 2019
• October 2019
• September 2019
• August 2019
• July 2019
• June 2019
• May 2019
• April 2019
• March 2019
• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• August 2018
• July 2018
• June 2018
• May 2018
• April 2018
• March 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• November 2017
• October 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• May 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• Dec 2015
• Nov 2015
• Oct 2015
• Sept 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• May 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
 
October: More Sand, More Lines
October 2025

I’ll bet you all thought everything was rosy after Matchroom and the World Pool Association had their kumbaya moment back in the spring, allowing players to enter events of their choosing without (theoretically) repercussion.

Well, all those fourth quarter event conflicts that freckled the calendar back then are in full swing now, and the ramifications for players and promoters are once again impacting the fields at various tournaments and could be felt well into 2026.

While the WPA World 10-Ball Championship in mid-September did not clash with a World Nineball Tour event, the impact of the Matchroom/WPA contract was clearly felt. Since previously banned players (predominantly players who competed in the WNT Hanoi Open in October 2024) were stripped of their WPA points, a number of top stars did not qualify for the world championship through points or through WPA member federation allotments. And the small number of wildcard entries available left players like Francisco Sanchez Ruiz, David Alcaide and Jayson Shaw on the outside looking in. (All opted to pass on entering a qualifying event in Vietnam ahead of the main tournament.)

The main upcoming conflicts pit the WNT Hanoi Open against the Predator/WPA World 8-Ball and World Doubles 10-Ball Championship in Indonesia, followed by the WNT Philippines Open in Manila clashing with the $450,000 Qatar World Cup 10-Ball Championship.

The fallout from the clashes is magnified by their impacts on both the Reyes Cup and Mosconi Cup WNT team events. Some players have indicated that a spot in either/both events is predicated on attendance in both Hanoi and Manila. With marquee (and rankings qualified) names like U.S. star Shane Van Boening and German strongman Joshua Filler already committed to the World 8-Ball and Qatar events, speculation is strong that neither will be asked to participate in either Reyes or Mosconi. Despite his lofty ranking, Filler was left off both squads in 2024 after skipping the Hanoi Open to protect his WPA status.

Once again, major international tournaments will feature incomplete fields.

Again, these standoffs have been expected and even anticipated. After six months of waiting, we’ll finally see players’ choices and Matchroom’s responses.

To me, however, the various conflicts and omissions, while long anticipated, are a stark reminder that unless Matchroom, the WPA and Predator find a way to work together on a 2026 calendar, the fallout from players once again having to make choices on where to compete will simply compound an already testy and inadequate situation.

The primary problems are twofold: First, according to sources, Matchroom’s agreement with the WPA technically runs through the end of 2027. But the contract also allows the two sides will review the contract in January 2026, with an option to terminate the remainder of the contract.

If Matchroom and the WPA are willing to revisit the contract in January, there are two topics I’d personally love to see them delve into. First, Matchroom needs to sanction its events with the WPA. In the current contract, WNT events are “ratified,” which allows Matchroom more operational control over each event, but the players don’t earn WPA points. It is painfully apparent that, given the growth in prize funds and in number of WPA events, those points are important to WNT players. Would the WPA be willing to sanction and still allow Matchroom operational leniency? I’d hope so. Second, pull out the WPA calendar and push Matchroom to pencil in dates for its events to not only avoid conflict, but to complement the existing schedule wherever possible. That is also where WPA sanction will help Matchroom. Let’s face it, promoters who sanction events with WPA are going to get date preference over promoters whose events are not sanctioned (or ratified).

Matchroom’s 2025 schedule (or lack thereof) was problematic throughout the year. Everyone is well aware of the logistical minefield the promoter has to negotiate in staging its events, but it’s time to start giving the players a schedule at the start of the year. And time is of the essence, since the 2026 WPA calendar already features at least six major events, including several Predator Pro Billiard Series tournaments, the China Open and Qatar 10-Ball World Cup.

What the pool world does not want (or need) is another year of event chaos, ultimatums and player angst. Pool is sitting on its most promising launchpad in decades. Look at the all the amazing opportunities out there for players. Now, think about their power and the impact they could have if they were presented in a rational and complementary fashion!

There will still be plenty of opportunity for the various promoters to market their individual brands. It’s time for all parties to concede a little turf protection for the betterment of the whole.

MORE VIDEO...