HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
From the Publisher
By Mike Panozzo
Mike became editor of Billiards Digest in 1980 and liked it so much that he bought the company. He has served on the Billiard Congress of America board of directors and as president of the Billiard & Bowling Institute of America.


Archives
• December 2025
• November 2025
• October 2025
• September 2025
• August 2025
• July 2025
• June 2025
• May 2025
• April 2025
• March 2025
• February 2025
• January 2025
• December 2024
• November 2024
• October 2024
• September 2024
• August 2024
• July 2024
• June 2024
• May 2024
• April 2024
• March 2024
• February 2024
• January 2024
• December 2023
• November 2023
• October 2023
• September 2023
• August 2023
• July 2023
• June 2023
• May 2023
• April 2023
• March 2023
• February 2023
• January 2023
• December 2022
• November 2022
• October 2022
• September 2022
• August 2022
• July 2022
• June 2022
• May 2022
• April 2022
• March 2022
• February 2022
• January 2022
• December 2021
• November 2021
• October 2021
• September 2021
• August 2021
• July 2021
• June 2021
• May 2021
• April 2021
• March 2021
• February 2021
• January 2021
• December 2020
• November 2020
• October 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• July 2020
• June 2020
• May 2020
• April 2020
• March 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• December 2019
• November 2019
• October 2019
• September 2019
• August 2019
• July 2019
• June 2019
• May 2019
• April 2019
• March 2019
• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• August 2018
• July 2018
• June 2018
• May 2018
• April 2018
• March 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• November 2017
• October 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• May 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• Dec 2015
• Nov 2015
• Oct 2015
• Sept 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• May 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
 
January: Whatever It Takes
January 2026

Another Mosconi Cup in the books. Another Team Europe blowout. Another Team USA implosion. Another round of armchair quarterbacks offering the definitive answers for what needs to change to make the Mosconi Cup competitive again.

It’s the same old song.

Or is it?

As someone who has seen virtually every Mosconi Cup and has repeatedly opined that the Cup is fine and that its uniqueness makes it almost indestructible, I have to admit that this year struck a little different.

There seemed to be a different vibe in Alexandra Palace and around the pool community this year, a feeling that bordered on indifference. What has become apparent is that during the six years since the U.S. miraculously won back-to-back Cups has only served to widen the gap between the teams. And with that schism in talent, the sideshow has overtaken the actual competition. And to be honest, the Mosconi Cup has become repetitive and tired.

Just follow the script: Press conference “fireworks.” Working the crowd into a faux lather in the second rack of the opening team match. Line dancing and leading the same singalongs as each previous year.

Rinse and repeat.

I’m afraid the Mosconi Cup needs a bit of a facelift. Of course, nothing would go farther towards adding genuine, new excitement than somehow getting Team USA to pocket match-winning 9 balls when the opportunity arises.

In the meantime, what can Matchroom do to slow the movement of the Cup from its origins of raucous nationalistic pride amid great play to today’s presentation of boorish, over-the-top fan engagement, bombastic player antics and myriad other actions that have little if anything to do with competitive pool?

And I’m not even talking about the rolling roar of the crowd during shots. I’ve always wanted to see more of that. The Mosconi Cup is the one event in which that type of fan engagement and added pressure works. And, trust me, the players will all get used to it now that it’s clearly acceptable.

Again, if the Mosconi Cup is indeed getting stale and leaning towards a fan base that is driving away pool purists, the fix is as simple as returning the event to being competitive. And in that department, the answers are plentiful.

During the recent Mosconi Cup, Matchroom founder Barry Hearn announced that his company will be taking its talents directly into the U.S., opening an office for pool and darts and focusing on increasing opportunities for both pros and junior players to raise the overall level of play and competitiveness in America. That’s a welcome, albeit ambitious, undertaking by pool’s biggest promoter.

In the meantime, what will make next year’s Team USA more competitive?

I’ll tell you what won’t. And that’s rehashing the same formula that has not worked over the past two years. While the shift to playing captain works just fine for Team Europe (it was, after all, Jayson Shaw’s idea, and he’s perfectly suited to that role), it clearly has not worked with Team USA.

The idea of a non-playing captain, at least for Team USA, received a lot of discussion following the 2025 Cup. Numerous names were floated, including Matchroom pundit Scott Frost, former Mosconi Cup player Dennis Hatch and former Team USA captain Johan Ruysink. I like any of those options over the current structure. And, personally, I still prefer Johan for the simple reason that he is a proven difference maker.

Regardless, it does feel like the Mosconi Cup is at a crossroads. Seeing as it is Matchroom’s Golden Goose, I assume they also see that and will address the key issues. And this time hopefully before November!

MORE VIDEO...