HomeAbout Billiards DigestContact UsArchiveAll About PoolEquipmentOur AdvertisersLinks
From the Publisher
By Mike Panozzo
Mike became editor of Billiards Digest in 1980 and liked it so much that he bought the company. He has served on the Billiard Congress of America board of directors and as president of the Billiard & Bowling Institute of America.


Archives
• October 2026
• September 2026
• August 2026
• July 2026
• June 2026
• May 2026
• April 2026
• March 2026
• February 2026
• January 2026
• December 2025
• November 2025
• October 2025
• September 2025
• August 2025
• July 2025
• June 2025
• May 2025
• April 2025
• March 2025
• February 2025
• January 2025
• December 2024
• November 2024
• October 2024
• September 2024
• August 2024
• July 2024
• June 2024
• May 2024
• April 2024
• March 2024
• February 2024
• January 2024
• December 2023
• November 2023
• October 2023
• September 2023
• August 2023
• July 2023
• June 2023
• May 2023
• April 2023
• March 2023
• February 2023
• January 2023
• December 2022
• November 2022
• October 2022
• September 2022
• August 2022
• July 2022
• June 2022
• May 2022
• April 2022
• March 2022
• February 2022
• January 2022
• December 2021
• November 2021
• October 2021
• September 2021
• August 2021
• July 2021
• June 2021
• May 2021
• April 2021
• March 2021
• February 2021
• January 2021
• December 2020
• November 2020
• October 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• July 2020
• June 2020
• May 2020
• April 2020
• March 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• December 2019
• November 2019
• October 2019
• September 2019
• August 2019
• July 2019
• June 2019
• May 2019
• April 2019
• March 2019
• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• August 2018
• July 2018
• June 2018
• May 2018
• April 2018
• March 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• November 2017
• October 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• May 2016
• Apr 2016
• Mar 2016
• Feb 2016
• Jan 2016
• Dec 2015
• Nov 2015
• Oct 2015
• Sept 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• October 2014
• August 2014
• May 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• September 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
 
November: Ego Driven
November 2026

Ego.

We all have one.

Of course, not everyone manages their ego the same way. While most people display a fairly healthy balance between quiet confidence and empathy, others we know play the superiority card and can’t admit failure.

Where I fall in these categories, I don’t even want to know! (Although being insecure about that probably gives away the answer!)

Now, there’s a reason I’ve launched into this Freudian topic, even if it’s a bit of a stretch. (Hey, you’ve gotta start somewhere!)

Companies have egos as well, especially highly motivated and successful companies. And when multiple successful companies operate in the same category, none want to be viewed as second to the others. That’s largely ego.

And in the quiet battle to satisfy those egos, companies generally work to set their bar in that category even higher than before. And the category becomes stronger, bigger and better.

And the market generally benefits.

Bet you know where I’m going with this.

I just finished watching the best players in the world compete for three world championships in a two-week span, with $700,000 in prize money between the three, and more than $300,000 sprinkled across a handful of ancillary events.

A few days later came news that the World Pool Championship, replete with its $1M prize fund, would be returning in early 2027, as well as the return of the long-lamented World Cup of Pool, the original big-time international team championship. A new World Nineball Tour (WNT) event in Spain has also been announced.

Earlier, Predator, producers of the Pro Billiard Series, within which the various PBS-produced World Championship events are staged, announced a long-term deal with the World Pool Association (WPA) to stage even more annual sanctioned World Championships — including … are you ready? … the WPA World One-Pocket Championship!

The WPA calendar in 2027 will feature no fewer than 10 sanctioned World Championships for pool, each with $200,000 minimum prize funds.

And before anyone gets their nose out of joint, I’m not at all suggesting that Predator, Matchroom (producers of the WNT) and the WPA (which still sanctions big independent events like the China Open and Qatar World Cup 10-Ball Championship, and are in current negotiations for other World Championships) are engaged in an ego-driven cat fight. Quite the opposite. Each, armed with disparate visions and business models, are simply upping their game for the good of their own companies and, by extension, the growth of the sport.

In other words, the players and fans are the beneficiaries of the drive to excel on the parts of the various promoters.

Put it this way: Remember when the promoters were passively threatening each other and openly threatening players? And remember how the players and fans were all talking about letting the players decide when and where they play? And letting the promoters do their own thing?

Well, this is it.

Do issues still exist? Of course. The annual buy-in costs to the players are still exorbitant, primarily because of the globetrotting requirements based on event locations. But if those demands continue to drive players away from the international game, promoters will have no choice but to address those concerns and come up with ways to soften that barrier to entry.

In the meantime, there have never been so many significant prize funds available in pool on an annual basis. Not even close. And I haven’t even touched on all the non-world title “majors” that the WNT and PBS offer annually.

And let’s not leave out the growth in eyeballs that the sport is starting to generate. And the industry is still doing all this on its own. Again, different approaches and different business models. But the numbers don’t lie, and eventually people outside our little community will take notice and recognize opportunity. It’s still a long journey ahead, but I do believe we’re trending in the right direction, which in itself is borderline miraculous given all the different hands that are trying to pull the same rope.

It’s always easy to find fault, nitpick and play politics. And we can continue to play that game and talk down the efforts of those still rolling the dice on this sport we love. I’m as guilty as anyone. But every once in a while, my head clears a little and I start adding up the positives.

And at that moment I once again become a believer.

MORE VIDEO...